commit

We use Perforce at work, and routinely keep software projects in the repository. In general creators follow the normal Perforce flow, BUT we also have a class of users, who doesn't have any need to edit the files but only read them. Currently we use P4Web but that requires the user so download each file individually to reassemble the project directory. Ideally I would like to have a process where when a user does a commit/submit in Perforce, the script would automatically run to generate a single zip file of the project directory and files, so that it was a one-click download that was

Using the PHP PDO interface to MySQL, suppose I have this code to end a transaction (assuming it was properly begun): $pdo->query('commit'); When the function returns, have writes to the log been flushed? That is, is the transaction committed, or have I merely made a request that it be committed? Assuming that I have not set any options to delay flushing, such as, for example, setting innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit to zero. I ask because, if I were to follow the code above with this: echo 'Transaction has been committed.'; I wouldn't want to be caught in a lie. UPDATE: See the comments below.

TODO：GitHub创建组织的步骤 使用GitHub进行团队合作，写这个步骤主要作用是为了OneTODO作为一个团队组织进行代码的分享，让更多人来参与。 使用帐号、密码登录GitHub 2.右上角加号下拉，选择“New organization” 3. 填写组织名和邮箱，选择开源版 4.邀请组织成员 5.创建成功 6.创建代码存储库 7.如果不选择“Initialize this repository with a README”，则需要手动上传。有三种方法可以创建代码库 7.1.创建新的代码库，从命令行推送代码库 7.2.从已有的代码文件，添加远程代码库，进行推送代码库 7.3.从其它代码库直接导入 8.以下是使用第一种方式进行创建代码仓库 9.在代码仓库添加代码文件main.go，和测试图片test.jpeg 10.上传更新的代码文件，先git add，在git commit，git push到github 11.这是管理员操作到过程，GitHub只有别人邀请才能加入组织，否则只能自己简历组织，如果创建到组织是免费的，则是开发的模式，任何人都能访问。 12.GitHub的普通用户访问组织项目地址，进行fork 13.使用git clone代码到本地 14.修改代码，查看代码修改内容 15.提交代码，参考第10步骤 16.可以推送pull request给组织仓库来贡献代码

Our company is divided in teams and we perform code reviews before sending our code to the QA guys. Usually, any code we touch is reviewed by someone inside the same team (A), but in some cases we also need to touch code from another team (B). For those cases, the code review should be two-fold: one part reviewed by team A, and another part reviewed by team B . Our problem is that many times the team A does not send the code to be reviewed by team B and this causes team B to be ignorant of this new code. What I'd like to do is to periodically run a script to find commits inside certain parts

I'm currently using git for managing several projects, however, one question has been bugging me recently: what is the good tone for committing modifications to the master branch and to secondary branches? Should it be 'commit when it compiles', 'commit when it works', or something else? Thanks. It really depends, is this your personal repo or is it a repo that is shared by many developers? How far into the project are you? Personally I commit to my subversion repositories when I am done with one aspect and everything compiles. It does not have to be complete, just not broken. I prefer to not