code-organization

Matplotlib create real time animated graph

末鹿安然 提交于 2019-11-29 04:16:59
I am having a hard time setting up my code to create a real time animated graph, my code is graphing after the data is being collected, not showing every iteration. My script runs a regression function then stores in a file, then I access the files and plot them, here is what I have, what do I need to move around or change to have it graph real time? I tried moving the plot functions inside the for loop but that didn't work, any suggestions? fig = plt.figure() ax1 = fig.add_subplot(1,1,1) num = 10 for idx in range(1,num): c,e = Regr_magic() with open("CK_output.txt",'a') as CK: CK.write("{0},

Repeating module name for each module component

戏子无情 提交于 2019-11-29 02:35:18
问题 The famous Best Practice Recommendations for Angular App Structure blog post outlines the new recommended angularjs project structure which is now component-oriented, not functionally-oriented, or as named in the initial github issue - "Organized by Feature". The blogpost suggests that each file inside each module should start with the module name, e.g.: userlogin/ userlogin.js userlogin.css userlogin.html userlogin-directive.js userlogin-directive_test.js userlogin-service.js userlogin

What are the advantages of using more then 1 code file for a project? (C++) [closed]

£可爱£侵袭症+ 提交于 2019-11-29 01:37:33
What are the advantages of using multiple source ( .cpp ) and header ( .h ) files in a single project? Is it just a preferential thing or are there true benefits? It helps you split your code and sort it by theme. Otherwise you get one file with 1000s of lines… which is hard to manage… Usually, people have .h and .c for one or sometimes a few classes. Also, it speeds up compilation, since only the modified files, and some related files need to be recompiled. From Organizing Code Files in C and C++ : Splitting any reasonably-sized project up buys you some advantages, the most significant of

Splitting a JavaScript namespace into multiple files

我怕爱的太早我们不能终老 提交于 2019-11-29 00:19:45
问题 Let's say I have a namespace like that: var myNamespace = { foo: function() { }, bar: function() { } }; What is the best way to split this code into files defining foo and bar separately? I'm not worried about loading time - I'll concatenate it back into one file before deployment. 回答1: At the start of each file: if(myNameSpace === undefined) { var myNameSpace = {}; } File 1: myNamespace.foo = function()... File 2: myNamespace.bar = function()... 回答2: // File1: // top level namespace here:

AutoOpen attribute in F#

浪尽此生 提交于 2019-11-28 22:43:55
What is the recommended doctrine for using the AutoOpen attribute ? (This question is probably is in continuation to when to use module function VS static function on similarly named type ) Expert F# states that "This can be useful when you’re defining ad hoc top-level operators and functions:" So this seems to be here to kind of diminish the module role in the code organization, when you technically need one to write the code but you remove its existence from a client perspective. Is there something else ? When do you use it ? I think the main use for the AutoOpen attribute is when you want

Unit-testing with dependencies between tests

房东的猫 提交于 2019-11-28 21:14:08
How do you do unit testing when you have some general unit tests more sophisticated tests checking edge cases, depending on the general ones To give an example, imagine testing a CSV-reader (I just made up a notation for demonstration), def test_readCsv(): ... @dependsOn(test_readCsv) def test_readCsv_duplicateColumnName(): ... @dependsOn(test_readCsv) def test_readCsv_unicodeColumnName(): ... I expect sub-tests to be run only if their parent test succeeds. The reason behind this is that running these tests takes time. Many failure reports that go back to a single reason wouldn't be

Setting up a large software system in Delphi

走远了吗. 提交于 2019-11-28 17:36:58
We have a software package which is about 16 years old. It's gone through just about every version of Delphi (besides .NET ones). Over the years, things have become very confusing when it comes to cross-referencing and keeping proper setup for additional packages (like third-party libraries). I was wondering if there is some standard practice when it comes to keeping large projects (and groups of projects) like this organized. So to explain the current setup... This is a multi-application system. Meaning, there are 12 executable projects (and a few DLL and service projects) involved. We also

jQuery and “Organized Code”

泪湿孤枕 提交于 2019-11-28 15:19:30
I've been struggling lately with understanding the best way to organize jQuery code. I asked another question earlier and I don't think I was specific enough ( found in this question here ). My problem is that the richer you make an application, the quicker your client side gets out of control. Consider this situation... //Let's start some jQuery $(function() { var container = $("#inputContainer"); //Okay let's list text fields that can be updated for(var i=0; i < 5; i++) { //okay let's add an event for when a field changes $("<input/>").change(function() { //okay something changed, let's

Are there tools that help organizing #includes?

倾然丶 夕夏残阳落幕 提交于 2019-11-28 07:22:18
Are there any tools that help organizing the #include s that belong at the top of a .c or .h file? I was just wondering because I am reorganizing my code, moving various small function definitions/declarations from one long file into different smaller files. Now each of the smaller files needs a subset of the #include s that were at the top of the long file. It's just annoying and error-prone to figure out all #includes by hand. Often the code compiles even though not all #include s are there. Example: File A uses std::vector extensively but doesn't include vector ; but it currently includes

How are words bound within a Rebol module?

半城伤御伤魂 提交于 2019-11-28 06:53:54
I understand that the module! type provides a better structure for protected namespaces than object! or the 'use function. How are words bound within the module—I notice some errors related to unbound words: REBOL [Type: 'module] set 'foo "Bar" Also, how does Rebol distinguish between a word local to the module ( 'foo ) and that of a system function ( 'set )? Minor update, shortly after: I see there's a switch that changes the method of binding: REBOL [Type: 'module Options: [isolate]] set 'foo "Bar" What does this do differently? What gotchas are there in using this method by default? OK,