armv7

How to return a number larger than 8 bits from main()?

自闭症网瘾萝莉.ら 提交于 2021-02-05 07:55:29
问题 So as far as I can tell, the exit code returned from r0 only uses the lowest 8 bits of this register. How wouuld I return a value higher than 8 bits? Here is the ARMv7 code: @ looping.s @ calculates sum of integers from 1 to 100 .text .balign 4 .global main main: MOV r1, #0 @ r1 = 0 as sum MOV r2, #0 @ r2 = 0 as counter loop: ADD r2, r2, #1 @ counter = counter + 1 ADD r1, r1, r2 @ sum = sum + counter CMP r2, #100 @ counter - 100 BLT loop @ if counter < 100 go to start of loop MOV r0, r1 @

Android NDK - armeabi vs armeabi-v7a folder

倾然丶 夕夏残阳落幕 提交于 2021-01-29 19:12:23
问题 There are some questions like mine. why I need put *.so files in both armeabi-v7a and armeabi folders? Why armeabi-v7a conflicts with armeabi of another module? Why use armeabi-v7a code over armeabi code? But I am not clear yet. I have many .so files for armeabi and armeabi-v7a. // binaries armeabi/libarmeabi-v7a-module1.so armeabi/libarmeabi-v7a-module2.so // Application.mk file APP_ABI := armeabi APP_PLATFORM := android-19 APP_STL := gnustl_shared // Android.mk file include $(CLEAR_VARS)

Is there an advantage of specifying “-mfpu=neon-vfpv3” over “-mfpu=neon” for ARMs with separate pipelines?

十年热恋 提交于 2020-03-21 19:29:12
问题 My Zynq-7000 ARM Cortex-A9 Processor has both the NEON and the VFPv3 extension and the Zynq-7000-TRM says that the processor is configured to have "Independent pipelines for VFPv3 and advanced SIMD instructions" . So far I compiled my programs with Linaro GCC 6.3-2017.05 and the -mfpu=neon option, to make use of SIMD instructions. But in the case that the compiler also has non-SIMD operations to be issued, will it make a difference to use -mfpu=neon-vfpv3 ? Will GCC's instruction selection

Is there an advantage of specifying “-mfpu=neon-vfpv3” over “-mfpu=neon” for ARMs with separate pipelines?

三世轮回 提交于 2020-03-21 19:25:47
问题 My Zynq-7000 ARM Cortex-A9 Processor has both the NEON and the VFPv3 extension and the Zynq-7000-TRM says that the processor is configured to have "Independent pipelines for VFPv3 and advanced SIMD instructions" . So far I compiled my programs with Linaro GCC 6.3-2017.05 and the -mfpu=neon option, to make use of SIMD instructions. But in the case that the compiler also has non-SIMD operations to be issued, will it make a difference to use -mfpu=neon-vfpv3 ? Will GCC's instruction selection

Is there an advantage of specifying “-mfpu=neon-vfpv3” over “-mfpu=neon” for ARMs with separate pipelines?

六眼飞鱼酱① 提交于 2020-03-21 19:24:12
问题 My Zynq-7000 ARM Cortex-A9 Processor has both the NEON and the VFPv3 extension and the Zynq-7000-TRM says that the processor is configured to have "Independent pipelines for VFPv3 and advanced SIMD instructions" . So far I compiled my programs with Linaro GCC 6.3-2017.05 and the -mfpu=neon option, to make use of SIMD instructions. But in the case that the compiler also has non-SIMD operations to be issued, will it make a difference to use -mfpu=neon-vfpv3 ? Will GCC's instruction selection

route-me won't compile in xCode 4

雨燕双飞 提交于 2020-02-05 05:17:05
问题 I'm trying to get route-me offline maps to compile in xCode 4. They were fine in xCode 3. I believe my issue is with architecture settings. Looking at the following post, it looks like I should change proj4 to be armv6 only and leave the main project and mapview at standard (v6 & v7). However, I still get the following errors: Undefined symbols for architecture armv6: "_OBJC_CLASS_$_RMMarker", referenced from: objc-class-ref in OSMapViewController.o "_OBJC_CLASS_$_RMDBMapSource", referenced

validating an iPhone app archive

烂漫一生 提交于 2020-01-03 18:54:32
问题 Trying to send an app to Apple's App Store. Xcode 4.3.2. Successfully sent the app out to users via testflightapp and now want to send it to the store. When I try to distribute the app via the organizer I get these three validation errors: iPhone/iPod Touch: application executable is missing a required architecture. At least one of the following architecture(s) must be present: armv6 Application failed codesign verification. The signature was invalid, contains disallowed entitlements, or it

Moving to iOS6 I get this linker error with almost all external packages

霸气de小男生 提交于 2020-01-02 04:30:22
问题 "file was built for archive which is not the architecture being linked (armv7s)" do I need to wait for people to release new binaries or I have a way out, I get this for GoogleAnalytics Restkit ... EDIT: problem with Restkit solved with their latest commit, just pull from github, 回答1: Yes, they will have to release binaries which are compiled for armv7s architecture to support the new iPhone 5 A6 processor. In the meantime, you can temporarily compile against only armv7 to continue

Google Conversion Tracking for iOS linker error for architecture armv7

你。 提交于 2020-01-01 08:53:55
问题 I'm trying to add the Google Conversion Tracking for iOS feature to my iPhone app. The app's base SDK is iOS6 the app's valid architectures is armv7, armv7s the app's iOS deployment targer is 4.3 I'm using the latest xcode 4.5.2 and OSX 10.8.2 The app is in appstore and is ok for iPhone 3-4-5 When I try to add the Google Conversion Tracking for iOS following this link: https://developers.google.com/mobile-ads-sdk/docs/admob/conversion-tracking I have this error: Undefined symbols for

iOS making a universal library - for i386 and arm7

感情迁移 提交于 2020-01-01 01:15:34
问题 We are building a library for use in iOS development. We can generate either a i386 library for the simulator, or a arm7 library for the hardware device. As it is now, we need to have two different files (.a libraries) when distributing the library to our other developers. This is a little bit cumbersome for distribution purposes. I was wondering; is there a way to build the library in XCode so that a single .a library file has both i386 and arm7 in it, so that we can distribute just a single