可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
What's the nicest way to convert a Vector to an Array in Actionscript3?
The normal casting syntax doesn't work:
var myVector:Vector. = new Vector(); var myArray:Array = Array(myVector); // calls the top-level function Array()
due to the existance of the Array function. The above results in an array, but it's an array with a single element consisting of the original Vector.
Which leaves the slightly more verbose:
var myArray:Array = new Array(); for each (var elem:Foo in myVector) { myArray.push(elem); }
which is fine, I guess, though a bit wordy. Is this the canonical way to do it, or is there a toArray() function hiding somewhere in the standard library?
回答1:
your approach is the fastest ... if you think it's to verbose, then build a utility function ... :)
edit:
To build a utility function, you will probably have to drop the type as follows:
function toArray(iterable:*):Array { var ret:Array = []; for each (var elem:Foo in iterable) ret.push(elem); return ret; }
回答2:
There is a function called forEach which both Vector and Array has which you can use. Basically it calls a function for each element in the vector. This is how it works:
var myVector:Vector. = new Vector(); var myArray:Array = []; myVector.forEach(arrayConverter); function arrayConverter(element:*, index:int, array:Array):void{ myArray[myArray.length] = element; }
But I couldn't find a function which just moves all the values from the Vector to an Array. Another solution could be that you create a class which extends the Vector class and then you have a public function called toArray() and then you have that code in that function so you don't have to write it each time you want to convert.
Vector documentation
Edit: Found this old question today and thought it would be interesting to do a benchmark test of all the different methods this sunday morning.
I used a vector with 1000000 items in and made 2 tests for each loop. One using the built in array functions push and one using regular array operations.
- For loop, not push: 520 ms
- For loop, push: 1027 ms
- Foreach loop, not push: 1753 ms
- Foreach loop, push: 2264 ms
- While loop, not push: 2775 ms
- While loop, not push: 3282 ms
- Util loop, not push: 4059 ms
- Util loop, push: 4570 ms
And here is a benchmark using 1000 items:
- For loop, not push: 1 ms
- For loop, push: 2 ms
- Foreach loop, not push: 2 ms
- Foreach loop, push: 3 ms
- While loop, not push: 3 ms
- While loop, not push: 4 ms
- Util loop, not push: 4 ms
- Util loop, push: 5 ms
Basically it's when you get over 10 000 items you start to see the real difference. So between 0 and 10 000 items it doesn't really matter which you use.
package { public class Loops{ public static function forLoop(vector:Vector., usePush:Boolean = false):Array{ var result:Array = []; for(var i:int = 0; i , usePush:Boolean):Array{ var result:Array = []; for each(var key:String in vector){ if(usePush){ result.push(vector[key]); }else{ result[result.length] = vector[key]; } } return result; } public static function whileLoop(vector:Vector., usePush:Boolean):Array{ var result:Array = []; var i:int = 0; while(i , usePush:Boolean):Array{ var result:Array = []; function arrayUtilForeach(element:*, index:int, array:Array):void{ if(usePush){ array.push(element); }else{ array[result.length] = element; } } vector.forEach(arrayUtilForeach); return result; } } }
I used the getTimer function to do the benchmark, so it might not be 100% accurate but there's so much difference between the different loops so I don't think it matters.
I hope someone found this useful.
回答3:
use:
var myArray:Array = []; myArray.push.apply(null, myVector);
or
var myArray:Array = new Array().concat(myVector);
回答4:
for each will not guarantee that the order of your items will be the same.
for in should give you a closer match.
private var _vector:*; public function VectorUtil(vector:*) { _vector = vector; } public function toArray():Array { var a:Array = []; for (var i:int = 0; i
回答5:
Vaukalak second answer not only works but is much faster than the top voted answer here, I've massaged it a little as [] produces fractionally faster array construction than new Array(). Also included below is the best way to create a Vector from an Array too.
// make a Vector from an array var toVector : Vector. = Vector.(['a','b','c']) // populate an array from a Vector var toArray : Array = [].concat(toVector);
Please note, this only seems to work with flash 11
回答6:
a function call for each element in the Vector would be a LOT slower, particularly in a longer Vector. however, these examples are probably all equivalent, unless you're dealing with a fairly long Vector/Array -- legibility and ease of use are generally more important than optimization.
that said, i think the fastest way is to use a while loop with an iterator compared against 0.
var myArray:Array = new Array(myVector.length); var i:int=myVector.length; while (i--) { myArray[i] = myVector[i]; }
unfortunately, you can't stuff this technique into a method for ease of repeated use, because there's no way to specify a Vector method parameter of a generic base type.... :(
回答7:
If you have a vector of strings, you could do:
myArray = myVec.join(",").split(",");
for a quick and dirty Array conversion.
回答8:
var a:Array = some_vector as Array;