问题
This is a follow-up on this question. The code in the OP question there looked quite reasonable and unambiguous to me. Why does not C++ allow using former parameters to define default values of latter parameters, something like this:
int foo( int a, int b = a );
Also, at least in C++11 declared types of parameters can be used to determine the return type, so it's not unheard of to use function parameters in similar manner:
auto bar( int a ) -> decltype( a );
Thus the question: what are the reason(s) why the above declaration of foo
is not allowed?
回答1:
For one thing, this would require that a
is evaluated before b
, but C++ (like C) does not define the order of evaluation for function parameters.
You can still get the effect you want by adding an overload:
int foo(int a, int b)
{ /* do something */ }
int foo(int a)
{ return foo(a, a); }
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31713217/why-c-does-not-allow-function-parameters-used-for-default-values-latter-parame