问题
I am using the PCL version of sqlite.net from here (https://github.com/oysteinkrog/SQLite.Net-PCL).
Here is my simple class.
public class LogEntry
{
[PrimaryKey, AutoIncrement]
public int Key { get; set;}
public DateTime Date { get; set; }
}
When a new instance of LogEntry is created, the Key is automatically set to 0. I set the Date to something and then call InsertOrReplace. The record does get saved in my database. The Key field gets the autoincrement value which happens to be 0 since it is the first record.
I then create a new instance of LogEntry (Key is automatically initialized to 0) and set the date to something else. I then call InsertOrReplace. Since there is an existing record with a Key of 0 that record gets updated.
What is the proper way to deal with this? I considered initializing the Key to -1, but that didn't seem to work either.
Does anyone have an example of this working?
回答1:
I experienced the same issue as you are describing. Try
var rowsAffected = Connection.Update(object);
if(rowsAffected == 0) {
// The item does not exists in the database so lets insert it
rowsAffected = Connection.Insert(object);
}
var success = rowsAffected > 0;
return success;
I just tried above and it works as expected
回答2:
If you change the Key to a nullable type (int?) it should work. then SQLite sees null coming in and generates new id when needed.
public class LogEntry
{
[PrimaryKey, AutoIncrement]
public int? Key { get; set;}
public DateTime Date { get; set; }
}
回答3:
The way this works is the source of much confusion but whereas Insert
treats zeroed primary keys as a special case when AutoIncrement
is set, InsertOrReplace
does not.
So with:
[PrimaryKey, AutoIncrement]
public int id { get; set; }
if you InsertOrReplace
a series of zero id records into a new table, the first will be stored at id: 0
and each subsequent one will save over it. Whereas if you just Insert
each one then because of the AutoIncrement
the first will save at id: 1
and the next at id: 2
etc. as you might expect.
If you change the key type to a nullable int, then records with null ids will be treated as inserts by InsertOrReplace
, and you don't actually need the AutoIncrement
attribute at all in this case, they will still save in sequence starting at 1.
[PrimaryKey]
public int? id { get; set; }
If you can't use that for some reason you can do your own check for zero ids and for those call Insert
instead, e.g.
Func<Foo, int> myInsertOrReplace = x =>
{
return x.id == 0 ? _db.Insert(x) : _db.InsertOrReplace(x);
};
but in this case you must use the AutoIncrement
attribute, otherwise first zero insert will be saved at 0 and the second will throw a constraint exception when it attempts insert another such.
回答4:
To get the result you want, you need to make the id property of your class nullable. see here link
回答5:
My solution for this is kind of similar to Joacar's, but instead of doing an update, I select the item, if it's null, I create a new item, otherwise update that items values, and then call InserOrReplace.
var existingKey = await this.GetItem(key);
Item item;
if (existingKey.Value != null)
{
profile = new Item
{
Id = existingKey.Id,
Key = existingKey.Key,
Value = newValue,
};
this.InsertOrReplaceAsync(item);
}
else
{
item = new Item
{
Key = key,
Value = value,
};
this.InsertAsync(item);
}
It might not be optimal, but it worked for me.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25409870/how-to-use-insertorreplace-in-sqlite-net-pcl