The scenarios is like this:
We have some SQL table. We are performing an SQL query on this table and we have results in TADOQuery object.
var
qryOryginal, qryClone: TADOQuery;
begin
//setup all the things here
qryOryginal.Active := True;
qryClone.Clone(qryOryginal, ltBatchOptimistic);
qryOryginal.Delete; //delete in qryOryginal casues that qryClone deletes its record too!
end;
So, after cloning the DataSet my qryClone should hold and independent data(at least I thought so). However, performing Delete on qryOryginal causes the same operation on the qryClone. I don't want that.
Any ideas?
I know I could store the data elsewhere, in TClientDataSet perhaps but I would like to try the above solution first.
Thanks in advance for your time.
Cloning just clones the cursor on dataset, not duplicating the data kept in the dataset.
If you need to have two independent data, then you have to copy the data from the original dataset to the second one.
If you want to read or modify a single dataset without changing the current cursor on the dataset, then you can use Clone method.
You can use the recordset of a TADODataSet to clone a TADODataSet.
ds1.Recordset := CloneRecordset(ds2.Recordset);
This version works from Delphi XE. ADOInt is updated with the type library definitions for MDAC 2.8
uses ADOInt, Variants;
function CloneRecordset(const Data: _Recordset): _Recordset;
implementation
function CloneRecordset(const Data: _Recordset): _Recordset;
var
newRec: _Recordset;
stm: Stream;
begin
newRec := CoRecordset.Create as _Recordset;
stm := CoStream.Create;
Data.Save(stm, adPersistADTG);
newRec.Open(stm, EmptyParam, CursorTypeEnum(adOpenUnspecified),
LockTypeEnum(adLockUnspecified), 0);
Result := newRec;
end;
This version must be used for versions of Delphi prior to Delphi XE. ADOR_TLB is generated from msado28.tlb.
uses ADOInt, ADOR_TLB, Variants;
function CloneRecordset(const Data: ADOInt._Recordset): ADOInt._Recordset;
implementation
function CloneRecordset(const Data: ADOInt._Recordset): ADOInt._Recordset;
var
newRec: ADOR_TLB._Recordset;
stm: Stream;
begin
newRec := ADOR_TLB.CoRecordset.Create as ADOR_TLB._Recordset;
stm := CoStream.Create;
(Data as ADOR_TLB._Recordset).Save(stm, adPersistADTG);
newRec.Open(stm, EmptyParam, CursorTypeEnum(adOpenUnspecified),
LockTypeEnum(adLockUnspecified), 0);
Result := newRec as ADOInt._Recordset;
end;
I more like realization with TClientDataSet, because we can freely edit it as we need after copying.
var
MyADOStoredProc: TADOStoredProc;
DataSetProvider: TDataSetProvider;
ClientDataSet: TClientDataSet;
DataSource: TDataSource;
...
// here now we have an opened ADOStoredProc object MyADOStoredProc
// let's copy data from it
DataSetProvider := TDataSetProvider.Create(Self);
DataSetProvider.Name := 'DataSetProvider' + FormatDateTime('_yyyy_mm_dd_hh_nn_ss', Now);
DataSetProvider.DataSet := MyADOStoredProc;
ClientDataSet := TClientDataSet.Create(Self);
ClientDataSet.ProviderName := DataSetProvider.Name;
DataSource := TDataSource.Create(Self);
DataSource.DataSet := ClientDataSet;
ClientDataSet.Open;
MyADOStoredProc.Close;
ClientDataSet.First;
// here we can modify our ClientDataSet as we need, besides MyADOStoredProc is closed
if not ClientDataSet.Eof then
ClientDataSet.Delete;
...
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2198675/how-to-achieve-independent-cloned-tadodataset