问题
Setting a custom property to a value of inherit
does exactly what you’d expect for every other CSS property: it inherits the same property value of its parent.
normal property inheritance:
<style>
figure {
border: 1px solid red;
}
figure > figcaption {
border: inherit;
}
</style>
<figure>this figure has a red border
<figcaption>this figcaption has the same border
as its parent because it is inherited</figcaption>
</figure>
custom property inheritance (explicit):
<style>
figure {
--foobar: 1px solid green;
}
figure > figcaption {
--foobar: inherit;
border: var(--foobar);
}
</style>
<figure>this figure has no border
<figcaption>this figcaption has a green border
because it explicitly inherits --foobar</figcaption>
</figure>
custom property inheritance (implicit):
all custom properties (unlike border
) are inherited by default
<style>
figure {
--foobar: 1px solid green;
}
figure > figcaption {
border: var(--foobar);
}
</style>
<figure>this figure has no border
<figcaption>this figcaption has a green border
because it implicitly inherits --foobar</figcaption>
</figure>
my question
How do you set a literal value of inherit
to a custom property, when you want its value to actually calculate to the keyword inherit
?
<style>
figure {
border: 1px solid red;
--foobar: 1px solid green;
}
figure > figcaption {
border: var(--foobar);
}
figure > figcaption:hover {
--foobar: inherit;
}
</style>
<figure>this figure has a red border
<figcaption>this figcaption has a green border
because it inherits --foobar</figcaption>
</figure>
<!-- on hover -->
<figure>this figure has a red border
<figcaption>I want this figcaption
to have a red border (inherited from figure)
but its border is green!</figcaption>
</figure>
In this example, I want the second figcaption
(on hover) to inherit its parent’s red border, so I set --foobar
to inherit
. However as shown in example 2, this does not calculate to inherit
, it calculates to the value that is inherited from the parent’s property --foobar
(if it has one), which in this case is green.
I completely understand why the CSS authors designed it this way: --foobar
is just like any other CSS property, so setting inherit
should inherit its value. So I guess I’m asking if there is a workaround for getting the second figcaption
to inherit its parent’s border.
Note, I considered doing
figure > figcaption:hover {
border: inherit;
}
but this defeats the purpose of using a CSS variable.
In the case that there are many other properties in figure > figcaption
that all use the value var(--foobar)
, I don’t want to redefine them all over again for the hover scenario. I'd rather set these properties only once, and then reassign the variable based on context.
回答1:
I did some thinking and this solution just hit me. I can use custom properties in conjunction with preprocessor mixins.
<style type="text/less">
// NOTE: not syntactically valid CSS!
.mx-border(@arg) {
border: @arg;
}
figure {
.mx-border(1px solid red);
--foobar: 1px solid green;
}
figure > figcaption {
.mx-border(var(--foobar));
}
figure > figcaption:hover {
.mx-border(inherit);
}
</style>
<figure>this figure has a red border
<figcaption>this figcaption has a green border
because it inherits --foobar</figcaption>
</figure>
<!-- on hover -->
<figure>this figure has a red border
<figcaption>This figcaption
has a red border because the mixin
sets the `border` property to `inherit`.</figcaption>
</figure>
This way, I can encapsulate all the dependent styles into the .mx-border()
mixin. Doing this doesn’t take advantage of CSS custom properties, but it does alleviate the hassle of writing everything a second time for the :hover
.
Essentially it is the same as writing border: inherit;
, with the added ability of putting more styles into the mixin and not having to duplicate them.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/39881816/how-do-i-set-a-value-of-inherit-to-a-css-custom-property