How can I calculate the variance of a list in python?

廉价感情. 提交于 2019-11-30 06:49:04

You can use numpy's built-in function var:

import numpy as np

results = [-14.82381293, -0.29423447, -13.56067979, -1.6288903, -0.31632439,
          0.53459687, -1.34069996, -1.61042692, -4.03220519, -0.24332097]

print(np.var(results))

This gives you 28.822364260579157

If - for whatever reason - you cannot use numpy and/or you don't want to use a built-in function for it, you can also calculate it "by hand" using e.g. a list comprehension:

# calculate mean
m = sum(results) / len(results)

# calculate variance using a list comprehension
var_res = sum((xi - m) ** 2 for xi in results) / len(results)

which gives you the identical result.

If you are interested in the standard deviation, you can use numpy.std:

print(np.std(results))
5.36864640860051

@Serge Ballesta explained very well the difference between variance n and n-1. In numpy you can easily set this parameter using the option ddof; its default is 0, so for the n-1 case you can simply do:

np.var(results, ddof=1)

The "by hand" solution is given in @Serge Ballesta's answer.

Both approaches yield 32.024849178421285.

You can set the parameter also for std:

np.std(results, ddof=1)
5.659050201086865

Well, there are two ways for defining the variance. You have the variance n that you use when you have a full set, and the variance n-1 that you use when you have a sample.

The difference between the 2 is whether the value m = sum(xi) / n is the real average or whether it is just an approximation of what the average should be.

Example1 : you want to know the average height of the students in a class and its variance : ok, the value m = sum(xi) / n is the real average, and the formulas given by Cleb are ok (variance n).

Example2 : you want to know the average hour at which a bus passes at the bus stop and its variance. You note the hour for a month, and get 30 values. Here the value m = sum(xi) / n is only an approximation of the real average, and that approximation will be more accurate with more values. In that case the best approximation for the actual variance is the variance n-1

varRes = sum([(xi - m)**2 for xi in results]) / (len(results) -1)

Ok, it has nothing to do with Python, but it does have an impact on statistical analysis, and the question is tagged and

Note: ordinarily, statistical libraries like numpy use the variance n for what they call var or variance, and the variance n-1 for the function that gives the standard deviation.

Starting Python 3.4, the standard library comes with the variance function (sample variance or variance n-1) as part of the statistics module:

from statistics import variance
# data = [-14.82381293, -0.29423447, -13.56067979, -1.6288903, -0.31632439, 0.53459687, -1.34069996, -1.61042692, -4.03220519, -0.24332097]
variance(data)
# 32.024849178421285

The population variance (or variance n) can be obtained using the pvariance function:

from statistics import pvariance
# data = [-14.82381293, -0.29423447, -13.56067979, -1.6288903, -0.31632439, 0.53459687, -1.34069996, -1.61042692, -4.03220519, -0.24332097]
pvariance(data)
# 28.822364260579157

Also note that if you already know the mean of your list, the variance and pvariance functions take a second argument (respectively xbar and mu) in order to spare recomputing the mean of the sample (which is part of the variance computation).

Numpy is indeed the most elegant and fast way to do it.

I think the actual question was about how to access the individual elements of a list to do such a calculation yourself, so below an example:

results=[-14.82381293, -0.29423447, -13.56067979, -1.6288903, -0.31632439,
      0.53459687, -1.34069996, -1.61042692, -4.03220519, -0.24332097]

import numpy as np
print 'numpy variance: ', np.var(results)


# without numpy by hand  

# there are two ways of calculating the variance 
#   - 1. direct as central 2nd order moment (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moment_(mathematics))divided by the length of the vector
#   - 2. "mean of square minus square of mean" (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variance)

# calculate mean
n= len(results)
sum=0
for i in range(n):
    sum = sum+ results[i]


mean=sum/n
print 'mean: ', mean

#  calculate the central moment
sum2=0
for i in range(n):
    sum2=sum2+ (results[i]-mean)**2

myvar1=sum2/n
print "my variance1: ", myvar1

# calculate the mean of square minus square of mean
sum3=0
for i in range(n):
    sum3=sum3+ results[i]**2

myvar2 = sum3/n - mean**2
print "my variance2: ", myvar2

gives you:

numpy variance:  28.8223642606
mean:  -3.731599805
my variance1:  28.8223642606
my variance2:  28.8223642606

The correct answer is to use one of the packages like NumPy, but if you want to roll your own, and you want to do incrementally, there is a good algorithm that has higher accuracy. See this link https://www.johndcook.com/blog/standard_deviation/

I ported my perl implementation to Python. Please point out issues in the comments.

Mklast = 0
Mk = 0
Sk = 0
k  = 0 

for xi in results:
  k = k +1
  Mk = Mklast + (xi - Mklast) / k
  Sk = Sk + (xi - Mklast) * ( xi - Mk)
  Mklast = Mk

var = Sk / (k -1)
print var

Answer is

>>> print var
32.0248491784
import numpy as np
def get_variance(xs):
    mean = np.mean(xs)
    summed = 0
    for x in xs:
        summed += (x - mean)**2
    return summed / (len(xs) - 1)
print(get_variance([1,2,3,4,5]))

out 2.5

a = [1,2,3,4,5]
variance = np.var(a, ddof=1)
print(variance)
易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!