Is there benefit to using Monit instead of a basic Upstart setup?

孤人 提交于 2019-11-29 18:41:42
flq

Given that Upstart just checks the PID, a tool like Monit that makes an actual request will provide you an answer of app sanity more faithfully. A process may happily be running but stuck in some way such that it is not serving requests.

I highly recommend using both Monit AND upstart. Upstart makes it easy to deamonize node.js and Monit comes packed with tons of useful app checks including memory usage, http requests, cpu usage, ...

This is an example of the most basic setup you can get. You could also easily add another monit config (with the same start and stop script) but using the PID file and monitoring process stats.

For the below configuration create a simple local-only request handler in your app that just responds with status 200 if all is well.

Monit config:

check host app_name with address 127.0.0.1
    start "/sbin/start app_name"
    stop "/sbin/stop app_name"
    if failed port 80 protocol HTTP
        request /ok
        with timeout 5 seconds
        then restart

Upstart script (/etc/init/app_name):

description "app_name"

start on startup
stop on shutdown

script
    # Node needs HOME to be set
    export HOME="path/to/node/app"

    exec sudo -u nodejs /usr/local/bin/node path/to/node/app/server.js production 2>>/var/log/app_name.error.log >>/var/log/app_name.log
end script
易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!