I have a block of a variable height in which I want to put another block with 100% height and vertical text (bottom-to-top direction) and stack it to the left side of the outer block. Is there a way to achieve it with CSS transforms but without width and height calculations in JS?
This is what I could get so far:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">
<head>
<style type="text/css">
.block1 {
border: 4px solid #888;
height: 120px;
width: 200px;
}
.block2 {
height: 100%;
border: 4px solid red;
}
.msg {
display: inline-block;
white-space: nowrap;
font-family: Verdana;
font-size: 14pt;
-moz-transform: rotate(-90deg);
-moz-transform-origin: center center;
-webkit-transform: rotate(-90deg);
-webkit-transform-origin: center center;
-ms-transform: rotate(-90deg);
-ms-transform-origin: center center;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="block1">
<table class="block2">
<tr>
<td>
<div class="msg">Hi there!</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</body>
</html>
You can see that the inner block's computed width is the same as the text width before rotation.
UPDATE:
Here is the picture of what I want to get in the end:
It's a horizontal stripe with items stacked to its left side, and with a vertical header block. Stripe's height is variable, so items should adapt and the header's text should remain centered.
I believe you were only using a <table>
because it seemed to be the easiest way to achieve what you were looking for, so I cut it out of the equation and used semantic HTML instead. If there was another reason, I apologize in advance and you should be able to port the styles over to use a <table>
instead.
See the jsFiddle demo to view the code in action. Or, continue on to the code:
HTML
<section class="wrapper">
<header><h1>Test</h1></header>
<article>Text.</article><!--
--><article>More text.</article><!--
--><article>Photos of cats.</article><!--
--><article>More photos of cats.</article>
</section>
CSS
.wrapper {
margin:1em;
position:relative;
padding-left:2em; /* line-height of .wrapper div:first-child span */
background:#fed;
}
.wrapper header {
display:block;
position:absolute;
top:0;
left:0;
bottom:0;
width:2em; /* line-height of .wrapper div:first-child span */
overflow:hidden;
white-space:nowrap;
}
.wrapper header h1 {
-moz-transform-origin:0 50%;
-moz-transform:rotate(-90deg) translate(-50%, 50%);
-webkit-transform-origin:0 50%;
-webkit-transform:rotate(-90deg) translate(-50%, 50%);
-o-transform-origin:0 50%;
-o-transform:rotate(-90deg) translate(-50%, 50%);
-ms-transform-origin:0 50%;
-ms-transform:rotate(-90deg) translate(-50%, 50%);
transform-origin:0 50%;
transform:rotate(-90deg) translate(-50%, 50%);
position:absolute;
top:0;
bottom:0;
height:2em; /* line-height of .wrapper div:first-child span */
margin:auto;
font-weight:bold;
font-size:1em;
line-height:2em; /* Copy to other locations */
}
.wrapper article {
display:inline-block;
width:25%;
padding:1em 1em 1em 0;
vertical-align:middle;
-moz-box-sizing:border-box;
-webkit-box-sizing:border-box;
-ms-box-sizing:border-box;
-o-box-sizing:border-box;
box-sizing:border-box;
}
How it works
The <header>
is set to the height of .wrapper
and has it's width
set to 2em
(value of line-height
for the <h1>
). Then, the <h1>
is vertically aligned (with top:0;bottom:0;height:2em;margin:auto;
[2em
is also from line-height
]). Once the <h1>
is vertically aligned, it is rotated counter-clockwise 90 degrees by the middle of its left side. In order to make the <h1>
visible again, it is translated 50%
vertically (to pull it back onto the screen horizontally) and -50%
horizontally (to vertically align it). And yes, the wording is correct--everything just gets confusing once you rotate by [-]90 degrees ;)
Gotchas
- Only a static "height" is supported for the
<h1>
. In this case, only 1 line is supported. - Wrapping will not work (I've actually disabled it in this example), so anything that doesn't fit in the
height
of.wrapper
will be hidden.
After looking at the transform styles more thoroughly, it doesn't appear so. You would need to know the precise height of the outter div
.
I came up with this:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">
<head>
<style type="text/css">
.block2 {
width: 100%;
border: 4px solid red;
}
.msg {
display: inline-block;
white-space: nowrap;
font-family: Verdana;
font-size: 14pt;
}
.block1 {
border: 4px solid #888;
-moz-transform: rotate(-90deg);
-moz-transform-origin: right top;
-webkit-transform: rotate(-90deg);
-webkit-transform-origin: right top;
-ms-transform: rotate(-90deg);
-ms-transform-origin: right top;
text-align:center;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="block1">
<table class="block2">
<tr>
<td>
<div class="msg">Hi there!</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<style>
.block1{
width:500px;
margin-left:-500px;
}
</style>
</body>
</html>
- switched the transformation to the outer element,
- then used width attribute to define the height at the bottom of the page (when you play with that, you are actually playing with the height there.)
- and for the empty left space visible after rotation, I used the variable width (height) as negative margin.
You can see it here: http://pastehtml.com/view/c0hl7zxci.html
The best I could come up with is this: http://jsfiddle.net/EwgtT/
The variable height of block1 won't be a problem, but the variable height of your message is; it will always start at the bottom.
Edit: Updated, so it works well in FF and IE: http://jsfiddle.net/EwgtT/2/
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10843380/100-height-block-with-vertical-text