In PowerShell v3.0 PSCustomObject
was introduced. It's like PSObject
, but better. Among other improvements (e.g. property order being preserved), creating object from hashtable is simplified:
[PSCustomObject]@{one=1; two=2;}
Now it seems obvious that this statement:
[System.Management.Automation.PSCustomObject]@{one=1; two=2;}
would work the same way, because PSCustomObject
is an "alias" for full namespace + class name. Instead I get an error:
Cannot convert the "System.Collections.Hashtable" value of type "System.Collections.Hashtable" to type "System.Management.Automation.PSCustomObject".
I listed accelerators for both types of objects:
[accelerators]::get.GetEnumerator() | where key -Like ps*object
Key Value
--- -----
psobject System.Management.Automation.PSObject
pscustomobject System.Management.Automation.PSObject
and discovered that both reference the same PSObject
class - this has to mean that using accelerators can do a bunch of other stuff than just making the code shorter.
My questions regarding this issue are:
- Do you have some interesting examaples of differences between using an accelerator vs using full type name?
- Should using full type name be avoided whenever an accelerator is available as a general best practice?
- How to check, maybe using reflection, if an accelerator does other stuff than just pointing to underlying class?
Looking at the static methods:
PS C:\> [PSCustomObject] | gm -Static -MemberType Method
TypeName: System.Management.Automation.PSObject
Name MemberType Definition
---- ---------- ----------
AsPSObject Method static psobject AsPSObject(System.Object obj)
Equals Method static bool Equals(System.Object objA, System.Object objB)
new Method psobject new(), psobject new(System.Object obj)
ReferenceEquals Method static bool ReferenceEquals(System.Object objA, System.Object o...
PS C:\> [System.Management.Automation.PSCustomObject] | gm -Static -MemberType Method
TypeName: System.Management.Automation.PSCustomObject
Name MemberType Definition
---- ---------- ----------
Equals Method static bool Equals(System.Object objA, System.Object objB)
ReferenceEquals Method static bool ReferenceEquals(System.Object objA, System.Object o...
The type accelerator has a couple of new static methods added. I suspect it's using one of those as the constructor.
[PSObject] and [PSCustomObject] are aliases for the same type - System.Management.Automation.PSObject. I can't say there's a good reason for it, but it is at least suggestive of two different purposes, and maybe that's reason enough.
System.Management.Automation.PSObject is used to wrap objects. It was introduced to provide a common reflection api over any object that PowerShell wraps - .Net, WMI, COM, ADSI, or simple property bags.
System.Management.Automation.PSCustomObject is just an implementation detail. When you create a PSObject, the PSObject must wrap something. For property bags, the object wrapped is System.Management.Automation.PSCustomObject.SelfInstance (an internal member.) This instance is hidden from normal use of PowerShell, the only way to observe it is with reflection.
Property bags are created in multiple ways in PowerShell:
$o1 = [pscustomobject]@{Prop1 = 42}
$o2 = new-object psobject -Property @{Prop1 = 42 }
Both $o1 and $o2 above will be an instance of PSObject, and the PSObject will wrap PSCustomObject.SelfInstance. PSCustomObject.SelfInstance is used internally in PowerShell to tell the difference between a simple property bag and wrapping any other object.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35894272/powershell-type-accelerators-psobject-vs-pscustomobject