问题
I have some raw text that is usually a valid UTF-8 string. However, every now and then it turns out that the input is in fact a CESU-8 string, instead. It is possible to technically detect this and convert to UTF-8 but as this happens rarely, I would rather not spend lots of CPU time to do this.
Is there any fast method to detect if a string is encoded with CESU-8 or UTF-8? I guess I could always blindly convert "UTF-8" to UTF-16LE and then to UTF-8 using iconv()
and I would probably get the correct result every time because CESU-8 is close enough to UTF-8 for this to work. Can you suggest anything faster? (I'm expecting the input string to be CESU-8 instead of valid UTF-8 around 0.01-0.1% of all string occurrences.)
(CESU-8 is a non-standard string format which contains 16-bit surrogate pairs encoded in UTF-8. Technically UTF-8 strings should contain the characters represented by those surrogate pairs, not the surrogate pairs itself.)
回答1:
Here's a more efficient version of your conversion function:
$regex = '@(\xED[\xA0-\xAF][\x80-\xBF]\xED[\xB0-\xBF][\x80-\xBF])@';
$s = preg_replace_callback($regex, function($m) {
$in = unpack("C*", $m[0]);
$in[2] += 1; // Effectively adds 0x10000 to the codepoint.
return pack("C*",
0xF0 | (($in[2] & 0x1C) >> 2),
0x80 | (($in[2] & 0x03) << 4) | (($in[3] & 0x3C) >> 2),
0x80 | (($in[3] & 0x03) << 4) | ($in[5] & 0x0F),
$in[6]
);
}, $s);
The code only converts high surrogates followed by low surrogates, and converts the two three-byte CESU-8 sequences directly into a four-byte UTF-8 sequence, i.e. from
ED A0-AF 80-BF ED B0-BF 80-BF
11101101 1010aaaa 10bbbbbb 11101101 1011cccc 10dddddd
to
F0-F4 80-BF 80-BF 80-BF
11110oaa 10aabbbb 10bbcccc 10dddddd // o is "overflow" bit
Here's an online example.
回答2:
CESU-8 strings will encode surrogate pairs using the byte sequence:
ED [A0..BF] [80..BF]
That is: 0xED
, followed by any byte between 0xA0
and 0xBF
(inclusive), followed by any byte between 0x80
and 0xBF
(inclusive).
Such a sequence of bytes cannot appear in any valid UTF-8 string, and are the only bytes allowed to appear in CESU-8 in excess of UTF-8. Checking for such a byte sequence should reliably detect CESU-8, and may be faster than decoding the entire string.
回答3:
Here is the implementation I'm currently using:
/**
* @param string $s raw input with UTF-8 or CESU-8 encoding
* @return string input with UTF-8 encoding
* @license MIT
*/
protected function verifyValidUtf8($s)
{
$s = preg_replace_callback('@(?:\xED[\xA0-\xBF][\x80-\xBF]){2}@', function ($m)
{
$bytes = unpack("C*", $m[0]); # always 6 bytes
# create UCS-4 character from CESU-8 encoded surrogate pair in $bytes
# 3 bytes CESU-8 to UNICODE high surrogate:
$high = (($bytes[1] & 0x0F) << 12) + (($bytes[2] & 0x3F) << 6) + ($bytes[3] & 0x3F);
# 3 bytes CESU-8 to UNICODE low surrogate:
$low = (($bytes[4] & 0x0F) << 12) + (($bytes[5] & 0x3F) << 6) + ($bytes[6] & 0x3F);
$codepoint = ($high & 0x03FF) << 10 | ($low & 0x03FF);
$codepoint += 0x10000;
return mb_convert_encoding(pack("N", $codepoint), "UTF-8", "UTF-32");
}, $s);
# replace unmatched surrogate pairs with U+FFFD REPLACEMENT CHARACTER
return preg_replace('@\xED[\xA0-\xBF][\x80-\xBF]@', "\xEF\xBF\xBD", $s);
}
(You might need pack("V", ...)
above if you have a big endian CPU...)
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34151138/convert-cesu-8-to-utf-8-with-high-performance