问题
We are a large company with about 2000 separate Java projects. For historic reasons, we do not have multi-module projects, but we would like to introduce them.
Logically, we already have "groups" of projects, i.e. someone responsible for (say) 50 projects which are closely related. This someone regularly publishes a BOM which contains recent, coherent versions of these 50 projects.
Now it would make a lot of sense to grab these 50 projects and put them into one large multi-module project. Still, it would be necessary to publish a BOM because other projects (outside our group) should have coherent versions.
So, summarised, we need a BOM that contains the versions of all 50 projects that are part of the multi-module project. I wonder what would be the "Maven way" to create such a BOM. What I can think of:
- The bom is the 51st project of the multi-module project. The versions of the dependencies are set by properties in the parent pom.
- The bom is generated from the information present in the multi-module project and published as side artifact (this probably requires us to write a Maven plugin for this).
What would be advisable?
回答1:
We are using BOMs as well for our multi-modules projects, but we are not tying their generation or update to the build of those modules.
A BOM is only updated when our release management process completes the delivery of a built module (or group of modules): once delivered, then the BOM is updated and pushed to Nexus (stored as a 1.0-SNAPSHOT version, constantly overridden after each delivery)
The BOM is then included within our POM (for mono or multi-module projects) and use for dependency management only, meaning our projects depends on artifact without the version: the dependency management from the BOM provides with the latest delivered version of other dependent modules.
In other words, we separate the build aspect (done here with maven) from the release part: the "bills of materials" represent what has been delivered, and ensure all projects are building with versions deemed working well together (since they have been delivered into production together).
回答2:
I've never seen 2K of commercial Java projects, so will base my answer on how open source works:
- Libraries shouldn't be grouped by people - they should be grouped by the problems that they solve. Often open source projects have multiple libs e.g. Jackson has
jackson-databind,jackson-datatype-jsr310, etc. These libs tightly relate to each and may depend on each other. - Such groups shouldn't be too big. Some projects may have 1, others - 5 or 10. 50 libs in a group sounds way too much.
- It's easier if libs in a group are released all at the same time (even if only one is updated). This makes it straightforward to keep track of versions in the apps that use multiple libs from a group.
- There should be no dependencies between groups! And this is probably the most important rule. Deep hierarchy of libraries that depend on each other is not acceptable because now you need to keep compatibility between many projects and libs. This just doesn't scale. Which means there will be occasional copy-paste code between libs - this is the lesser evil.
- There could be some exceptions to the last rule (maybe a lib that is used everywhere) but those must keep backward compatibility of the public API until there are no projects that depend on the old API. Such libs are very hard to maintain and it's better to opensource them.
Standalone projects now can depend on libraries from the same or different groups, but because the version within the group is the same, it's easy to set it as a property just once. Alternatively:
- You can look at
<scope>import</scope>which allows importing<dependencyManagement>sections from other POM files like parent POMs within a group (for some reason never worked for me). - Or at xxx-all modules - a module that depends on all other modules within group and thus when you depend on it, you also depend on others transitively.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47334049/publish-a-bom-from-a-multi-module-project