What is the trade off between history push and replace?

问题

I use History package to redirect invalid URL to 404 page on my react component.

I use .replace instead of .push simply because I don't want the browser to record any invalid url I have visited.

Have I missed the point here? And is there a trade-off between choosing one or the other for my purpose?

Can someone explain to me? thanks in advance ;)

回答1:

I think you have the right idea.

I personally use .replace when redirecting from an invalid url (or non relevant, i.e. redirect to "profile" page when a logged user goes to the "/login" url), so using the browser's "back" button works properly for the end user.

回答2:

router.replace acts like router.push, the only difference is that it navigates without pushing a new history entry, as its name suggests - it replaces the current entry.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/39340108/what-is-the-trade-off-between-history-push-and-replace