问题
I have two arrays:
@arr1 = ( 1, 0, 0, 0, 1 );
@arr2 = ( 1, 1, 0, 1, 1 );
I want to sum items of both arrays to get new one like
( 2, 1, 0, 1, 2 );
Can I do it without looping through arrays?
回答1:
for Perl 5:
use List::MoreUtils 'pairwise';
@sum = pairwise { $a + $b } @arr1, @arr2;
回答2:
If you're using Perl 6:
@a = (1 0 0 0 1) <<+>> (1 1 0 1 1) #NB: the arrays need to be the same size
The Perl 6 Advent Calendar has more examples.
回答3:
Fundamentally, no, you can't do it without "looping through arrays" because you need to access every element of both arrays in order to sum them. Both the answers so far just hide the looping under a layer of abstraction but it's still there.
If you're concerned about looping over very large arrays, it's probably best to consider other ways of keeping the sum up-to-date as you go.
回答4:
what's wrong with looping over arrays? that's the fundamentals.
@arr1 = ( 1, 0, 0, 0, 1 );
@arr2 = ( 1, 1, 0, 1, 1 );
for ($i=0;$i<scalar @arr1;$i++){
print $arr[$i] + $arr2[$i] ."\n";
}
回答5:
You've seen a C style for loop, and pairwise
. Here's an idiomatic Perl for loop and map
:
my @arr1 = ( 1, 0, 0, 0, 1 );
my @arr2 = ( 1, 1, 0, 1, 1 );
my @for_loop;
for my $i ( 0..$#arr1 ) {
push @for_loop, $arr1[$i] + $arr2[$i];
}
my @map_array = map { $arr1[$_] + $arr2[$_] } 0..$#arr1;
I like map
and pairwise
best. I'm not sure that I have a preference between those two options. pairwise
handles some boring details of plumbing for you, but it is not a built-in like map
. On the other hand, the map solution is very idiomatic, and may be opaque to a part-time perler.
So, no real wins for either approach. IMO, both pairwise
and map
are good.
回答6:
If you're really afraid of looping, then you can binary chop the arrays, sum the pairs, then recursively reassemble the resulting array. No looping there, and as a bonus you get to learn how part of the fast-fourier transform derivation works.
回答7:
From http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=122393
@a = qw(1 2 3 4);
@b = qw(1 2 3 4);
@c = ();
@c = map { $a[$_] + $b[$_] } ( 0 .. (@a > @b ? $#a : $#b) );
Or:
$c[@c] = $a[@c] + $b[@c] while defined $a[@c] or defined $b[@c];
Or:
$c[$_] = $a[$_] + $b[$_] for 0 .. (@a > @b ? $#a : $#b);
Or (in Perl 6):
@c = @a ^+ @b
回答8:
To avoid (explicit) looping, here is a solution that uses recursion "instead":
#!/usr/bin/perl
use v5.20;
my @arr1 = ( 1, 0, 0, 0, 1 );
my @arr2 = ( 1, 1, 0, 1, 1 );
my @result=non_looping_pairwise_sum([ @arr1 ], [ @arr2 ]); # pass in copies, so the originals are not modified
say "@result";
sub non_looping_pairwise_sum { # only handles lists that have the same length
my ($a1, $a2)=@_;
return () if (scalar(@$a1)==0 and scalar(@$a2)==0);
my $e1=shift @$a1;
my $e2=shift @$a2;
return ($e1+$e2, non_looping_pairwise_sum($a1, $a2));
}
Output:
2 1 0 1 2
Note that use v5.20
means you don't have to write use strict; use warnings
, I think.
Apologies/kudos to @parm for the idea.
回答9:
I'm not sure what you plan to do with the sum once you have it, but you plan to do more vector-y type stuff, then Math::Matrix might be a good fit.
use Math::Matrix;
my $foo = Math::Matrix->new([ 1, 0, 0, 0, 1 ]);
my $bar = Math::Matrix->new([ 1, 1, 0, 1, 1 ]);
my $sum = $foo->add($bar);
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1865910/how-can-i-sum-arrays-element-wise-in-perl