问题
Here is a code which, in fact, gives the correct output. But the question is about optimizing internal processes. They, conditionally, can be divided into 2 parts.
MAIN algorithm (set of codes which create relation chains)
DELETE pattern (removes unnecessary nodes, which do not meet the conditions)
Patterns' execution priority as i can rate on tests is 1-[MAIN] then finally 2-[DELETE]. But the thing is, the opposite order 1-[DELETE] then 2-[MAIN] would be, as i guess, a more effective solution. In this case, only the necessary nodes that form the chains would remain for MAIN-processing (so then inner additional-checking condition also will no longer be needed). But for now, MAIN algorithm is forced to do an extra, unnecessary computation. I tried to use additional priority attribute to the patterns, but it seems that it didn't change anything (because, as i understand, these two templates don't conflict with each other).
XSLT-code
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
xmlns:exslt="http://exslt.org/common">
<xsl:key name="Object-By-id" match="Object" use="@id"/>
<xsl:key name="Object-By-parent-id" match="Object" use="string(@id-parent)"/>
<xsl:variable name="fold-rtf">
<xsl:apply-templates select="/" mode="fold"/>
</xsl:variable>
<xsl:variable name="folded-tree" select="exslt:node-set($fold-rtf)"/>
<xsl:template match="@*|node()">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:apply-templates select="@* | node()"/>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="Object[not(@status='0')]"/> <!-- [DELETE] pattern -->
<xsl:template match="Object[@status=0]/@*[last()]"> <!-- [MAIN] -->
<xsl:variable name="current" select=".."/>
<xsl:copy/>
<xsl:for-each select="$folded-tree">
<xsl:for-each select="key('Object-By-id',$current/@id)">
<xsl:attribute name="chain-text">
<xsl:for-each select="ancestor-or-self::*">
<xsl:sort select="@rank"/>
<xsl:if test="position()!=1"> | </xsl:if>
<xsl:value-of select="concat(@text1,' ',@text2)"/>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:attribute>
<xsl:for-each select="ancestor-or-self::*">
<xsl:sort select="@rank"/>
<xsl:attribute name="level-{position()}">
<xsl:value-of select="concat(@text,' | ',@text2)"/>
</xsl:attribute>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="/|*" mode="fold">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:copy-of select="@*"/>
<xsl:apply-templates select="key('Object-By-parent-id',string(@id))" mode="fold">
</xsl:apply-templates>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
In sum i've got following questions:
a) In spite of the attempt, is there any kind of compulsory enforcing to change the priority of the template execution plan?
b) Or any other considerations?
here is sample bar just to demostrate how many computation cycles can be potentially saved. https://xsltfiddle.liberty-development.net/jz1Q1y5
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59921582/change-patterns-priority-or-revise-the-code