Because I've overloaded the operator++
for an iterator class
template<typename T>
typename list<T>::iterator& list<T>::iterator::operator++()
{
//stuff
}
But when I try to do
list<int>::iterator IT;
IT++;
I get a warning about there being no postifx ++
, using prefix form. How can I specifically overload the prefix/postifx forms?
Write a version of the same operator overload, but give it a parameter of type int
. You don't have to do anything with that parameter's value.
If you're interested in some history of how this syntax was arrived out, there's a snippet of it here.
http://www.devx.com/tips/Tip/12515
class Date {
//...
public:
Date& operator++(); //prefix
Date& operator--(); //prefix
Date operator++(int unused); //postfix
Date operator--(int unused); //postfix
};
Postfix has an int argument in the signature.
Class& operator++(); //Prefix
Class operator++(int); //Postfix
everything about operator overloading http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/operator-overloading.html
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/894804/how-to-differentiate-when-overloading-between-prefix-and-postfix-forms-of-oper