问题
Assume there is a template function foo()
which accepts an arbitrary number of arguments. Given the last argument is always an std::function
, how do I implement a foo()
template shown below in a way that CbArgs
would contain this std::function
's parameters?
template<typename... InArgs, typename... CbArgs = ???>
// ^^^^^^^^^^^^
void foo(InArgs... args) { ... }
For example, CbArgs
should be {int,int}
if invoked like this:
std::function<void(int,int)> cb;
foo(5, "hello", cb);
My first idea was:
template<typename... InArgs, typename... CbArgs>
void foo(InArgs... args, std::function<void(CbArgs...)>) { ... }
But this does not compile:
note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
note: mismatched types ‘std::function<void(CbArgs ...)>’ and ‘int’
foo(5, "hello", cb);
Question One:
Why doesn't this compile? Why does the template argument deduction fail?
Eventually, I came up this solution:
template<typename... InArgs, typename... CbArgs>
void fooImpl(std::function<void(CbArgs...)>, InArgs... args) { ... }
template<typename... InArgs,
typename CbType = typename std::tuple_element_t<sizeof...(InArgs)-1, std::tuple<InArgs...>>>
void foo(InArgs... args)
{
fooImpl(CbType{}, args...);
}
Here CbType
is the last type in InArgs
which is std::function
. Then a temporary of CbType
is passed to fooImpl()
where CbArgs
are deduced. This works, but looks ugly to me.
Question Two:
I wonder if there is a better solution without having two functions and a temporary instance of CbType
?
回答1:
Why doesn't this compile? Why does the template argument deduction fail?
When a parameter pack is not the last parameter, it cannot be deduced. Telling the compiler the contents of InArgs...
will make your foo
definition work:
template<typename... InArgs, typename... CbArgs>
void foo(InArgs..., std::function<void(CbArgs...)>) { }
int main()
{
std::function<void(int,int)> cb;
foo<int, const char*>(5, "hello", cb);
}
Alternatively, as you discovered in your workaround, simply put InArgs...
at the end and update your foo
invocation:
template<typename... InArgs, typename... CbArgs>
void foo(std::function<void(CbArgs...)>, InArgs...) { }
int main()
{
std::function<void(int,int)> cb;
foo(cb, 5, "hello");
}
I wonder if there is a better solution without having two functions and a temporary instance of
CbType
?
Here's a possible way of avoiding the unnecessary temporary instance but using your same mechanism for the deduction of CbArgs...
: simply wrap CbType
in an empty wrapper, and pass that to fooImpl
instead.
template <typename T>
struct type_wrapper
{
using type = T;
};
template<typename... InArgs, typename... CbArgs>
void fooImpl(type_wrapper<std::function<void(CbArgs...)>>, InArgs&&...) { }
template<typename... InArgs,
typename CbType =
std::tuple_element_t<sizeof...(InArgs)-1,
std::tuple<std::remove_reference_t<InArgs>...>>>
void foo(InArgs&&... args)
{
fooImpl(type_wrapper<CbType>{}, std::forward<InArgs>(args)...);
}
Additional improvements:
The
typename
aftertypename CbType =
was unnecessary - it was removed.args...
should be perfectly-forwarded tofooImpl
to retain its value category. Bothfoo
andfooImpl
should takeargs...
as a forwarding-reference.
wandbox example
Note that there is a proposal that would make dealing with non-terminal parameter packs way easier: P0478R0 - "Template argument deduction for non-terminal function parameter packs". That would make your original implementation work as intended.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42333734/template-argument-and-deduction-of-stdfunction-parameters