问题
There are several examples on how to define a RelayCommand in the ViewModel:
Option 1 (lazy):
/// <summary>
/// Gets the LogOnCommand.
/// </summary>
/// <value>The LogOnCommand.</value>
public RelayCommand<LogOnUser> LogOnCommand
{
get
{
if (this.logOnCommand == null)
{
this.logOnCommand = new RelayCommand<LogOnUser>(
action =>
{
// Action code...
},
g => g != null);
}
return this.logOnCommand;
}
}
Option 2 (in constructor)
/// <summary>
/// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="LogOnFormViewModel"/> class.
/// </summary>
public LogOnFormViewModel()
{
this.logOnCommand = new RelayCommand<LogOnUser>(
action =>
{
// Action code...
},
g => g != null);
}
/// <summary>
/// Gets the LogOnCommand.
/// </summary>
/// <value>The LogOnCommand.</value>
public RelayCommand<LogOnUser> LogOnCommand {get; private set;}
What is the best / clearest design ?
回答1:
It really depends on what style you prefer. Most people don't like having a bunch of logic in property getters if they can avoid it.
Personally, I prefer having a real method to call instead of an anonymous method. My ViewModels look something like this.
public class MyViewModel : ViewModelBase
{
public RelayCommand<CommandParam> MyCommand { get; private get; }
public MyViewModel()
{
CreateCommands();
}
private void CreateCommands()
{
MyCommand = new RelayCommand<CommandParam>(MyCommandExecute);
}
private void MyCommandExecute(CommandParam parm)
{
// Action code...
}
}
Notice that if you're not using the enable command, you don't need to call the ctor overload that sets that.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3433899/mvvm-light-relaycommand-define-it-lazy-or-in-constructor