问题
I was recently looking at the wikipedia page for dependent types, and I was wondering; does Perl 6 actually introduce dependent types? I can't seem to find a reliable source claiming that.
It might be obvious to some, but it sure as heck ain't obvious to me.
回答1:
Against Ven, in the comments following the Perl 6 answer to the SO question "Is there a language with constrainable types?", wrote "perl6 doesn't have dependant types" and later wrote "dependent type, probably not, ... well, if we get decidable where
s..." in an exchange on #perl6. (Larry Wall's response was "what's a few halting problems among friends". Btw, by far the best way to get an authoritative answer on all things Perl 6 is to ask TimToady via #perl6.)
For The summary for the 'dependent-type' SO tag is "Dependent types are types that depend on values." Perl 6 supports types that depend on values, so there's that.
For The edit summary for the change by Awwaiid that added Perl 6 to Wikipedia's page on Dependent Types says "Perl 6 ... has undecidable dependent types".
The Wikipedia page starts with:
a dependent type is a type whose definition depends on a value. A "pair of integers" is a type. A "pair of integers where the second is greater than the first" is a dependent type because of the dependence on the value.
Here's one way to create a type along those lines in Perl 6:
subset LessMorePair of Pair where { $_.key < $_.value }
subset MoreLessPair of Pair where { $_.key > $_.value }
multi sub foo ( Pair) { " P" }
multi sub foo (LessMorePair) { "LMP" }
multi sub foo (MoreLessPair) { "MLP" }
for 1 => 1, 1 => 2, 2 => 1 { say foo $_ }
# P
# LMP
# MLP
Does this mean the Perl 6 subset
feature generates dependent types? Perhaps this is what Awwaiid is thinking of.
回答2:
Arguably yes as subsets are types that may depend on arbitrary conditions. However, the type system would be classified as unsound as type invariants are not enforced.
In particular, a variable's type constraint is only checked on assignment, so modifications to an object that make it drop from a subset will lead to a variable holding an object it should not be able to, eg
subset OrderedList of List where [<=] @$_;
my OrderedList $list = [1, 2, 3];
$list[0] = 42;
say $list ~~ OrderedList;
You can use some meta-object wizardry to make the object system automatically check the type after any method call by boxing objects in transparent guard objects.
A naive implementation could look like this:
class GuardHOW {
has $.obj;
has $.guard;
has %!cache =
gist => sub (Mu \this) {
this.DEFINITE
?? $!obj.gist
!! "({ self.name(this) })";
},
UNBOX => sub (Mu $) { $!obj };
method find_method(Mu $, $name) {
%!cache{$name} //= sub (Mu $, |args) {
POST $!obj ~~ $!guard;
$!obj."$name"(|args);
}
}
method name(Mu $) { "Guard[{ $!obj.^name }]" }
method type_check(Mu $, $type) { $!obj ~~ $type }
}
sub guard($obj, $guard) {
use nqp;
PRE $obj ~~ $guard;
nqp::create(nqp::newtype(GuardHOW.new(:$obj, :$guard), 'P6int'));
}
This will make the following fail:
my $guarded-list = guard([1, 2, 3], OrderedList);
$guarded-list[0] = 42;
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/38947616/does-perl6-support-dependent-types