问题
I understand how forall
enables us to write polymorphic function.
According to this chapter, the normal function which we generally write are Rank 1 types. And this function is of Rank 2 type:
foo :: (forall a. a -> a) -> (Char,Bool)
foo f = (f 'c', f True)
It explains like this:
In general, a rank-n type is a function that has at least one rank-(n-1) argument but no arguments of even higher rank.
What does it actually mean by rank argument ?
Can somebody give an example of Rank 3 type which is similar to the above foo
function.
回答1:
Rank is defined inductively on the structure of types:
rank (forall a. T) = max 1 (rank T)
rank (T -> U) = max (if rank T = 0 then 0 else rank T + 1) (rank U)
rank (a) = 0
Note how it increases by one on the left-hand side of an arrow. So:
Rank 0: Int
Rank 1: forall a. a -> Int
Rank 2: (forall a. a -> Int) -> Int
Rank 3: ((forall a. a -> Int) -> Int) -> Int
and so on.
回答2:
n
is the level at which the forall
(s) is/are nested. So if you have forall a. ((a -> a) -> Bla)
(which is simply a more verbose way of writing (a -> a) -> Bla
), then the forall
is on the outside and applies to the whole function, so it's rank 1. With (forall a. a -> a) -> Bla
the forall
only applies to the inner function (i.e. the one you take as an argument) and is thus rank 2.
If the function that you take as an argument would itself take another function as an argument and that function would have a forall
in its type, then that would be rank 3. And so on.
回答3:
foo
has one argument that includes a universal quantor, that what kicks in the need for RankN. But this argument's type itself, a -> a
, is rank-1, it's the only argument, so foo
has rank n with n − 1 = 1, i.e. foo
is rank-2.
Now consider
bar :: ((forall a. a -> a) -> (Char,Bool)) -> Int
This has an argument of foo
's type, which as we said has Rank 2. So that's the highest rank in bar
's arguments; bar
is thus a rank-3 function.
回答4:
In Robert Harper's Practical Foundations of Programming Languages (first edition), the definition of the types of rank k
is illustrated via inference rules. With this definition, if a type is of rank k
, then it is also of rank k+1
. So a type is associated with many different ranks k, k+1, k+2...
, which means we can use relations instead of functions for formalization. Let Type
be the set of all types, N
be the set of natural numbers, and S
be the desired subset of Cartesian product of Type
and N
. That is, an element of S
is a tuple (T, n)
saying "type T
is of rank n
". The following rules define ranks of a type.
(a, 0)
is inS
(T -> U, 0)
is inS
, if both(T, 0)
and(U, 0)
are inS
(T -> U, k+1)
is inS
, if both(T, k)
and(U, k+1)
are inS
(T, k+1)
is inS
, if(T, k)
is inS
(forall a. T, k+1)
is inS
, if(T, k+1)
is inS
given(a, k)
is inS
By the definition above, the type of id
and foo
in your question is of rank 1, 2, 3...
and 2, 3, 4...
respectively.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22362196/what-is-n-in-rankntypes