问题
It is usual to create custom IDs like this:
case class CustomID(value: Int) extends MappedTo[Int]
and to represent nullable custom IDs with types like Option[CustomID]. However, I would like to be able to move Option[_] into the case class, like this:
case class OptCustomID(optValue: Option[Int])
To be more specific, I am looking for a TypedType[OptCustomId] that behaves like the built-in TypedType[Option[Int]] for what concerns the database DDL.
Any ideas?
回答1:
Actually you don't need TypedType[OptCustomId]
. Correct way to handle table with field of type OptCustomID
is described at the page http://slick.lightbend.com/doc/3.3.0/userdefined.html
import slick.jdbc.PostgresProfile.api._
case class OptCustomID(optValue: Option[Int])
case class LiftedOptCustomID(optValue: Rep[Option[Int]])
implicit object OptCustomIDShape extends CaseClassShape(LiftedOptCustomID, OptCustomID)
case class Thing(id: OptCustomID, data: String)
case class LiftedThing(id: LiftedOptCustomID, data: Rep[String])
implicit object ThingShape extends CaseClassShape(LiftedThing.tupled, Thing.tupled)
class ThingTable(tag: Tag) extends Table[Thing](tag, "things") {
def id = column[Option[Int]]("id", O.PrimaryKey)
def data = column[String]("data")
def * = LiftedThing(LiftedOptCustomID(id), data)
}
val things = TableQuery[ThingTable]
val result: DBIO[Option[Thing]] = things.filter(x => x.id === 1).result.headOption
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55100254/scala-slick-getting-a-typedtype-for-a-wrapped-optiont