问题
I have a situation that I need to have a surrogate key (id
) in place of a composite key (4 field combined to be unique: project_id, dataset_id, table_id, view_name
) to easily refer that in other tables.
So to do this I used id
field as Primary key and other 4 fields mentioned above as unique keys. This is allowed in MySQL but not in MemSQL.
Error Code: 1895. The unique key named: 'project_id' must contain all columns specified in the primary key when no shard key is declared
So I added the id
field as the Shard key but no use.
CREATE TABLE `table_access_details` (
`id` integer primary key,
`project_id` varchar(1024) CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_general_ci NOT NULL,
`dataset_id` varchar(1024) CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_general_ci NOT NULL ,
`table_id` varchar(1024) CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_general_ci NOT NULL ,
`view_name` varchar(1024) CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_general_ci DEFAULT NULL ,
`upload_id` decimal (14,0) DEFAULT NULL,
`modified_datetime` timestamp NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP ON UPDATE CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
`created_datetime` timestamp NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
#SHARD KEY (`id`),
unique(`project_id`,`dataset_id`,`table_id`,`view_name`)
);
How can I overcome this situation in MemSQL?
回答1:
So, you want unique key (id) as well as unique key (project_id, dataset_id, table_id, view_name)? This is not possible in a sharded table in memsql - the unique key cannot be efficiently enforced across shards. Your options are: don't use both unique keys, or make the table a reference table.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40520136/memsql-surrogate-key-as-primary-and-different-unique-keys-at-the-same-time-in