问题
I have a XML document with chapters
and nested sections
.
I am trying to find, for any section, the first second-level section ancestor.
That is the next-to-last section in the ancestor-or-self
axis.
pseudo-code:
<chapter><title>mychapter</title>
<section><title>first</title>
<section><title>second</title>
<more/><stuff/>
</section>
</section>
</chapter>
my selector:
<xsl:apply-templates
select="ancestor-or-self::section[last()-1]" mode="title.markup" />
Of course that works until last()-1 isn't defined (the current node is the first
section).
If the current node is below the second
section, i want the title second
.
Otherwise I want the title first
.
回答1:
Replace your xpath with this:
ancestor-or-self::section[position()=last()-1 or count(ancestor::section)=0][1]
Since you can already find the right node in all cases except one, I updated your xpath to also find the first
section (or count(ancestor::section)=0
), and then select ([1]
) the first match (in reverse document order, since we are using the ancestor-or-self
axis).
回答2:
Here is a shorter and more efficient solution:
(ancestor-or-self::section[position() > last() -2])[last()]
This selects the last of the possibly first two topmost ancestors named section
. If there is only one such ancestor, then it itself is the last.
Here is a complete transformation:
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:output method="text"/>
<xsl:template match="section">
<xsl:value-of select="title"/>
<xsl:text> --> </xsl:text>
<xsl:value-of select=
"(ancestor-or-self::section[position() > last() -2])[last()]/title"/>
<xsl:text>
</xsl:text>
<xsl:apply-templates/>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="text()"/>
</xsl:stylesheet>
When this transformation is applied on the following document (based on the provided, but added more nested section
elements):
<chapter>
<title>mychapter</title>
<section>
<title>first</title>
<section>
<title>second</title>
<more/>
<stuff/>
<section>
<title>third</title>
</section>
</section>
</section>
</chapter>
the correct results are produced:
first --> first
second --> second
third --> second
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10420638/find-next-to-last-node-with-xpath