问题
I can call an asp.net mvc controller via Ajax.ActionLink("Get customers","GetCustomers","Customer");
I can do the same with the Html.ActionLink and a jquery ajax call.
Where is the difference?
回答1:
Where is the difference?
In the amount of code you have to write (less with Ajax.ActionLink) and the level of control you need (more with Html.ActionLink and a jquery ajax call).
So it's amount of code vs level of control and functionality needed => up to you to decide which one you need.
Both approaches are perfectly fine. The Ajax.ActionLink uses the jquery.unobtrisuve-ajax script to AJAXify the anchor behind the scenes.
Personally I always use Html.ActionLink + jQuery.
回答2:
No difference if you ask me $.ajax is what Ajax.ActionLink is using under the hood as @gdoron mentioned in his answer. Personally using $.ajax gives a more sense of control... you can manipulate more options available in $.ajax one plus point for Ajax.ActionLink is that i think it provides out of the box support of degradation if javascript is disabled never experienced it though but you can explore it...
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10277332/ajax-actionlink-vs-html-actionlink-jquery-ajax-call