Initializer list in a range for loop

问题

I have objects of different types derived from a single super-type. I wonder if there are any disadvantages in using std::initializer list in a range for loop like this:

for(auto object: std::initializer_list<Object *>{object1, object2, object3}) {
}

Is it completely OK and efficient or would it be better to use an array? To me the std::array solution seems to be more restrictive for the compiler and there is a disadvantage of explicitly stating the size:

for(auto object: std::array<Object*, 3>{object1, object2, object3}) {
}

Is there any other or nicer way of iterating over an explicitly given list of objects?

回答1:

There is no need to use the verbose std::initializer_list inside the loop

#include <iostream>
#include <initializer_list>

struct B { virtual int fun() { return 0; } };
struct D1 : B { int fun() { return 1; } };
struct D2 : B { int fun() { return 2; } };

int main()
{
    D1 x;
    D2 y;

    B* px = &x;
    B* py = &y;

    for (auto& e : { px, py })
            std::cout << e->fun() << "\n";    
}

Live Example.

If you want to do it on-the-fly without defining px and py, you can indeed use std::initializer_list<B*>{ &x, &y } inside the loop.

回答2:

You can simply write

for(auto object : {object1, object2, object3}) {
   // work
}

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22192616/initializer-list-in-a-range-for-loop