Objective-C: message syntax vs. dot syntax; what's the difference?

回眸只為那壹抹淺笑 提交于 2019-12-17 19:59:10

问题


If I'm using @synthesize foo;, what's the difference between the following:

// message syntax
[myObj setFoo:5];
[myObj foo];

and

// dot syntax
myObj.foo = 5;
myObj.foo;

I like the consistency of the dot syntax but I don't know if it's doing something I should be I concerned about.

Any additional information would be a great help.


回答1:


There is no functional difference between using dot syntax and using message syntax.

I find that using message syntax is more consistent with the language as a whole and that dot syntax was just implemented as a convenience to programmers who were coming over from languages that used it (Java comes to mind).

All I ask is: Whichever one you choose, be consistent with it. Do not mix and match single property setters! (Multiple-argument setters are obviously exempt).




回答2:


They are the same.

The dot syntax is used to signify the access of @property's which you can also acces via:

[myObject setValue: [NSNumber numberWithIntValue:5] forKey:@"foo"];
[myObject valueForKey:@"foo"];

But in essence the calls are the same.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4259946/objective-c-message-syntax-vs-dot-syntax-whats-the-difference

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!