Behavior of summing !is.na() results

放肆的年华 提交于 2019-12-17 19:33:51

问题


Why does the first line return TRUE, and the third line returns 1? I would expect both lines to return 1. What is the exact meaning of those extra two parentheses in the third line?

!is.na(5) + !is.na(NA)
# TRUE
(!is.na(5)) + (!is.na(NA))
# 1

edit: should check these multiple times. The original problem was with !is.na(), thought it replicated for is.na(). But it didn't :)


回答1:


! has a weird, counter-intuitive precedence in R.

Your first code is equivalent to

!(is.na(5) + !is.na(NA))

That is, ! has lower precedence than +.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17651687/behavior-of-summing-is-na-results

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!