问题
I am trying to implement my own doubly-linked list (my_list) code in C++, and in particular an iterator class for my list. My problem is I want to have an implicit conversion from iterator to const_iterator so that for example the code my_list::iterator it = l.begin();
where l
is an instance of my_list
compiles. However, I cannot find a way to do this without my compiler complaining.
Here is the code implementing the list nodes and the iterator class:
template<class T> class node {
node(const T& t = T()):data(t),next(0),prev(0) {}
T data;
node* next;
node* prev;
friend class my_list<T>;
friend class my_list_iterator<T>;
};
template<class T> class my_list_iterator {
public:
// increment and decrement operators
my_list_iterator operator++();
my_list_iterator operator++(int);
my_list_iterator operator--();
my_list_iterator operator--(int);
// bool comparison iterators
bool operator==(const my_list_iterator& other) const {return pos_==other.pos_;}
bool operator!=(const my_list_iterator& other) const {return pos_!=other.pos_;}
// member access
T& operator*() const {return pos_->data;}
T* operator->() const {return &(pos_->data);}
// implicit conversion to const iterator
operator my_list_iterator<const T>() {return my_list_iterator<const T>(pos_);}
private:
node<T>* pos_;
explicit my_list_iterator(node<T>* p=0):pos_(p) {}
friend class my_list<T>;
};
I have omitted the my_list implementation but if you think it is relevant I can include it. When I test this code, it won't compile on GCC with the following error:
In file included from test.cpp:2:
my_list.h: In instantiation of ‘my_list_iterator<T>::operator my_list_iterator<const T>() [with T = int]’:
test.cpp:12:49: required from here
my_list.h:37:48: error: no matching function for call to ‘my_list_iterator<const int>::my_list_iterator(node<int>*&)’
operator my_list_iterator<const T>() {return my_list_iterator<const T>(pos_);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
my_list.h:40:12: note: candidate: ‘my_list_iterator<T>::my_list_iterator(node<T>*) [with T = const int]’
explicit my_list_iterator(node<T>* p=0):pos_(p) {}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
my_list.h:40:12: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘node<int>*’ to ‘node<const int>*’
my_list.h:20:25: note: candidate: ‘constexpr my_list_iterator<const int>::my_list_iterator(const my_list_iterator<const int>&)’
template<class T> class my_list_iterator {
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
my_list.h:20:25: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘node<int>*’ to ‘const my_list_iterator<const int>&’
my_list.h:20:25: note: candidate: ‘constexpr my_list_iterator<const int>::my_list_iterator(my_list_iterator<const int>&&)’
my_list.h:20:25: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘node<int>*’ to ‘my_list_iterator<const int>&&’
Can someone help me with what I'm doing wrong?
回答1:
my_list.h:40:12: note: candidate: ‘my_list_iterator<T>::my_list_iterator(node<T>*) [with T = const int]’
explicit my_list_iterator(node<T>* p=0):pos_(p) {}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
my_list.h:40:12: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘node<int>*’ to ‘node<const int>*’
A node<int>
and a node<const int>
are unrelated types. You cannot pass a pointer to a node<int>
to a function that expects a pointer to a node<const int>
.
Instead of templating your iterator class on the contained type you could move the const
up one level and template your iterator on the node type:
template<class Node> class my_list_iterator {
public:
//...
// member access
auto& operator*() const {return pos_->data;}
auto* operator->() const {return &(pos_->data);}
// implicit conversion to const iterator
operator my_list_iterator<const Node>() {return my_list_iterator<const Node>{pos_};}
private:
Node* pos_;
explicit my_list_iterator(Node* p=0):pos_(p) {}
friend class my_list<type>;
};
template <class T> class my_list {
public:
using iterator = my_list_iterator<node<T>>;
using const_iterator = my_list_iterator<const node<T>>;
//...
};
Live Demo
Now you're passing a pointer to a node<int>
to a function expecting a pointer to a const node<int>
, and that's fine.
回答2:
This is one way to do it:
template <typename T>
class my_list {
public:
using iterator = my_list_iterator<T>;
using const_iterator = my_list_iterator<const T>;
const_iterator cbegin() const { return {/*...*/}; }
const_iterator cend() const { return {/*...*/}; }
const_iterator begin() const { return {/*...*/}; }
const_iterator end() const { return {/*...*/}; }
iterator begin() { return {/*...*/}; }
iterator end() { return {/*...*/}; }
};
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57718018/how-do-i-convert-iterator-to-const-iterator-in-my-custom-list-iterator-class