问题
I've found some puzzling behavior in the kernlab package: estimating SVMs which are mathematically identical produces different results in software.
This code snippet just takes the iris data and makes it a binary classification problem for the sake of simplicity. As you can see, I'm using linear kernels in both SVMs.
library(kernlab)
library(e1071)
data(iris)
x <- as.matrix(iris[, 1:4])
y <- as.factor(ifelse(iris[, 5] == 'versicolor', 1, -1))
C <- 5.278031643091578
svm1 <- ksvm(x = x, y = y, scaled = FALSE, kernel = 'vanilladot', C = C)
K <- kernelMatrix(vanilladot(), x)
svm2 <- ksvm(x = K, y = y, C = C, kernel = 'matrix')
svm3 <- svm(x = x, y = y, scale = FALSE, kernel = 'linear', cost = C)
However, the summary information of svm1 and svm2 are dramatically different: kernlab reports completely different support vector counts, training error rates, and objective function values between the two models.
> svm1
Support Vector Machine object of class "ksvm"
SV type: C-svc (classification)
parameter : cost C = 5.27803164309158
Linear (vanilla) kernel function.
Number of Support Vectors : 89
Objective Function Value : -445.7911
Training error : 0.26
> svm2
Support Vector Machine object of class "ksvm"
SV type: C-svc (classification)
parameter : cost C = 5.27803164309158
[1] " Kernel matrix used as input."
Number of Support Vectors : 59
Objective Function Value : -292.692
Training error : 0.333333
For the sake of comparison, I also computed the same model using e1071, which provides an R interface for the libsvm package.
svm3
Call:
svm.default(x = x, y = y, scale = FALSE, kernel = "linear", cost = C)
Parameters:
SVM-Type: C-classification
SVM-Kernel: linear
cost: 5.278032
gamma: 0.25
Number of Support Vectors: 89
It reports 89 support vectors, the same as svm1.
My question is whether there are any known bugs in the kernlab package which can account for this unusual behavior.
(Kernlab for R is an SVM solver that allows one to use one of several pre-packaged kernel functions, or a user-supplied kernel matrix. The output is an estimate of a support vector machine for the user-supplied hyperparameters.)
回答1:
Reviewing some of the code, it appears that this is the offending line:
https://github.com/cran/kernlab/blob/efd7d91521b439a993efb49cf8e71b57fae5fc5a/src/svm.cpp#L4205
That is, in the case of a user-supplied kernel matrix, the ksvm
is just looking at two dimensions, rather than whatever the dimensionality of the input is. This seems strange, and is probably a hold-over from some testing or whatever. Tests of the linear kernel with data of just two dimensions produces the same result: replace 1:4
with 1:2
in the above and the output and predictions all agree.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33813972/kernlab-kraziness-inconsistent-results-for-identical-problems