问题
(Possibly related to Do some programs not accept process substitution for input files?)
In some Bash unit test scripts I'm using the following trick to log and display stdout and stderr of a command:
command > >(tee "${stdoutF}") 2> >(tee "${stderrF}" >&2)
This process produces some output to stdout, so the $stdoutF
file gets some data. Then I run another command which does not output any data:
diff -r "$source" "$target" > >(tee "${stdoutF}") 2> >(tee "${stderrF}" >&2)
However, it doesn't look like this process always finishes successfully before the test for emptiness is run (using shunit-ng):
assertNull 'Unexpected output to stdout' "$(<"$stdoutF")"
In a 100 run test this failed 25 times.
Should it be sufficient to call sync
before testing the file for emptiness:
sync
assertNull 'Unexpected output to stdout' "$(<"$stdoutF")"
... and/or should it work by forcing the sequence of the commands:
diff -r "$source" "$target" \
> >(tee "${stdoutF}"; assertNull 'Unexpected output to stdout' "$(<"$stdoutF")")
2> >(tee "${stderrF}" >&2)
... and/or is it possible to tee
it somehow to assertNull
directly instead of a file?
Update: sync
is not the answer - See Gilles' response below.
Update 2: Discussion taken further to Save stdout, stderr and stdout+stderr synchronously. Thanks for the answers!
回答1:
In bash, a process substitution substitution command foo > >(bar)
finishes as soon as foo
finishes. (This is not discussed in the documentation.) You can check this with
: > >(sleep 1; echo a)
This command returns immediately, then prints a
asynchronously one second later.
In your case, the tee
command takes just one little bit of time to finish after command
completes. Adding sync
gave tee
enough time to complete, but this doesn't remove the race condition, any more than adding a sleep
would, it just makes the race more unlikely to manifest.
More generally, sync
does not have any internally observable effect: it only makes a difference if you want to access device where your filesystems are stored under a different operating system instance. In clearer terms, if your system loses power, only data written before the last sync
is guaranteed to be available after you reboot.
As for removing the race condition, here are a few of possible approaches:
Explicitly synchronize all substituted processes.
mkfifo sync.pipe command > >(tee -- "$stdoutF"; echo >sync.pipe) 2> >(tee -- "$stderrF"; echo >sync.pipe) read line < sync.pipe; read line < sync.pipe
Use a different temporary file name for each command instead of reusing
$stdoutF
and$stderrF
, and enforce that the temporary file is always newly created.Give up on process substitution and use pipes instead.
{ { command | tee -- "$stdoutF" 1>&3; } 2>&1 \ | tee -- "$stderrF" 1>&2; } 3>&1
If you need the command's return status, bash puts it in
${PIPESTATUS[0]}
.{ { command | tee -- "$stdoutF" 1>&3; exit ${PIPESTATUS[0]}; } 2>&1 \ | tee -- "$stderrF" 1>&2; } 3>&1 if [ ${PIPESTATUS[0]} -ne 0 ]; then echo command failed; fi
回答2:
I sometimes put a guard:
: > >(sleep 1; echo a; touch guard) \
&& while true; do
[ -f "guard" ] && { rm guard; break; }
sleep 0.2
done
回答3:
Insert a sleep 5
or whatnot in place of sync
to answer your last question
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4489139/bash-process-substitution-and-syncing