Why does FT_Read() fail in the child process but work in the parent process?

问题

I have the following program, which uses the ftd2xx library to write a byte to an USB device and then reads the reply.

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdarg.h>
#include "../ftd2xx.h"

void fatal (const char *format,...) {
  va_list argp;
  fprintf(stderr, "FATAL: ");
  va_start(argp, format);
  vfprintf(stderr, format, argp);
  va_end(argp);
  fprintf(stderr, "\n");
  exit(3);
}

int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
  int pid = fork();
  if (pid > 0) { //replace with: if (pid == 0) {
    FT_STATUS ftStatus;
    printf("before FT_OpenEx\n");
    FT_HANDLE ftHandle;  
    if ((ftStatus = FT_OpenEx("DA011SCV", FT_OPEN_BY_SERIAL_NUMBER, &ftHandle)) != FT_OK) fatal("FT_OpenEx failed");
    printf("before FT_Write\n");
    uint8_t buffer[1];
    buffer[0] = 0x55;
    DWORD bytesWritten;
    if ((ftStatus = FT_Write(ftHandle, buffer, sizeof(buffer), &bytesWritten)) != FT_OK) fatal("FT_Write failed");
    printf("before FT_Read\n");
    DWORD bytesRead;
    if ((ftStatus = FT_Read(ftHandle, buffer, 1, &bytesRead)) != FT_OK) fatal("FT_Read failed");
    if (bytesRead > 0) {
      printf("FT_Read data=0x%02X\n", buffer[0]);
    } else {
      printf("FT_Read no data\n");
    }
    printf("before FT_Close\n");
    if ((ftStatus = FT_Close(ftHandle)) != FT_OK) fatal("FT_Close failed");
    printf("press Enter to exit\n");
  }
  getchar();
  exit(0);
}

The code as shown produces this output:

//Output if (pid > 0)
before FT_OpenEx
before FT_Write
before FT_Read
FT_Read data=0x55
before FT_Close
press Enter to exit

However, if I change the condition of the first if from (pid > 0) to (pid == 0), i.e. if I do the USB communication in the child process, then the program hangs in the FT_Read() function and the output is:

//Output if (pid == 0)
before FT_OpenEx
before FT_Write
before FT_Read

Why does this happen?

Some details:

The USB chip in the device is a FT240X with factory setting.
The USB device acts like an echo: every byte it receives is immediately sent back.
I checked with a protocol analyzer that the transmitted byte values are correct.
The ftd2xx library version is 1.1.12.

回答1:

What you're describing sounds like there's a bug in the ftd2xx library -- it's possible that the library performs some initialization when it's loaded which becomes invalid when the process ID changes.

The ftd2xx library is closed-source and distributed under a license that prohibits reverse-engineering, so there's no way for me to tell for sure what's going on. You may want to try using an open-source FTDI library, such as libftdi, instead.

回答2:

The library is strange - I had the same problem. For me it helped to load the library dynamically after calling the fork(). Check this post https://stackoverflow.com/a/7626550/907675 to see how to dynamically load a function from a library.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35164253/why-does-ft-read-fail-in-the-child-process-but-work-in-the-parent-process

标签

Linux

fork

ftdi