问题
I'm trying to imitate Haskell's famous infinite fibonacci list in F# using sequences. Why doesn't the following sequence evaluate as expected? How is it being evaluated?
let rec fibs = lazy (Seq.append
(Seq.ofList [0;1])
((Seq.map2 (+) (fibs.Force())
(Seq.skip 1 (fibs.Force())))))
回答1:
The problem is that your code still isn't lazy enough: the arguments to Seq.append
are evaluated before the result can be accessed, but evaluating the second argument (Seq.map2 ...
) requires evaluating its own arguments, which forces the same lazy value that's being defined. This can be
worked around by using the Seq.delay
function. You can also forgo the lazy
wrapper, and list
s are already seq
s, so you don't need Seq.ofList
:
let rec fibs =
Seq.append [0;1]
(Seq.delay (fun () -> Seq.map2 (+) fibs (Seq.skip 1 fibs)))
However, personally I'd recommend using a sequence expression, which I find to be more pleasant to read (and easier to write correctly):
let rec fibs = seq {
yield 0
yield 1
yield! Seq.map2 (+) fibs (fibs |> Seq.skip 1)
}
回答2:
To add to kvb
's answer, you can also use Seq.unfold
to generate a (lazy) sequence:
let fibs = Seq.unfold (fun (a, b) -> Some(a+b, (b, a+b))) (0, 1)
val fibs : seq<int>
回答3:
Yet another way:
let rec fib = seq { yield 0; yield! Seq.scan (+) 1 fib }
回答4:
In addition to @kvb's answer: if you just want lazy and not necessarily the zip
trick, you can do this:
let fibs = Seq.unfold (fun (m,n) -> Some (m, (n,n+m))) (0,1)
This makes Seq.take n fibs
run in time O(n).
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22914448/infinite-fibonacci-sequence