问题
I've got the following code which I think ought to be binding a DataTable to a DataGridView, but the DataGridView shows up empty. The DataTable definately has rows, so I assume that I am binding the DataSource incorrectly some how. Does anyone see what is wrong with this:
DataBase db = new DataBase(re.OutputDir+"\\Matches.db");
MatchDBReader reader = new MatchDBReader(db.NewConnection());
BindingSource bindingSource = new BindingSource();
bindingSource.DataSource = reader.GetDataTable();
this.dataGridView1.DataSource = bindingSource.DataSource;
- The first line simply gets a handle to the DB that I'm pulling data from.
- The next line is a provides a class for reading from that same db - in particular it exposes the GetDataTable method with returns the data table that I intend to put into the DataGridView.
- The next line is uninteresting...
- The 4th line attempts to grab the DataTable - QuickWatch indicates that this is working...
- The final line is where I assume i've screwed up...my understanding is that this binds the DataTable to the DataGridView GUI, but nothing shows up.
Any thoughts?
回答1:
Try binding the DataGridView directly to the BindingSource, and not the BindingSource's DataSource:
this.dataGridView1.DataSource = bindingSource;
回答2:
You need to attach your BindingSource to your grid, before you get the data table.
Try switching the last two lines of code:
DataBase db = new DataBase(re.OutputDir+"\\Matches.db");
MatchDBReader reader = new MatchDBReader(db.NewConnection());
BindingSource bindingSource = new BindingSource();
this.dataGridView1.DataSource = bindingSource.DataSource;
bindingSource.DataSource = reader.GetDataTable();
回答3:
Along with above solutions also fix the "bindingSource" datamember property. like:
bindingSource.DataMember = yourDataSet.DataTable;
I had the same problem with sql database and datagrid view. After a great deal of trouble I found out that I've forgot to set dataMember property of my binding source.
best of luck.
回答4:
None of this worked for me, though it all seemed like good advice. What I ended up doing was the biggest, worst hack on earth. What I was hoping to accomplish was simply to load a DB table from a SQLite db and present it (read only, with sortable columns) in the DataGridView. The actual DB would be programmatically specified at runtime. I defined the DataSet by adding a DataGridView to the form and used the Wizards to statically define the DB connection string. Then I went into the Settings.Designer.cs file and added a set
accessor to the DB Connection string property:
namespace FormatDetector.Properties {
[global::System.Runtime.CompilerServices.CompilerGeneratedAttribute()]
[global::System.CodeDom.Compiler.GeneratedCodeAttribute("Microsoft.VisualStudio.Editors.SettingsDesigner.SettingsSingleFileGenerator", "9.0.0.0")]
internal sealed partial class Settings : global::System.Configuration.ApplicationSettingsBase {
private static Settings defaultInstance = ((Settings)(global::System.Configuration.ApplicationSettingsBase.Synchronized(new Settings())));
public static Settings Default {
get {
return defaultInstance;
}
}
[global::System.Configuration.ApplicationScopedSettingAttribute()]
[global::System.Diagnostics.DebuggerNonUserCodeAttribute()]
[global::System.Configuration.SpecialSettingAttribute(global::System.Configuration.SpecialSetting.ConnectionString)]
[global::System.Configuration.DefaultSettingValueAttribute("data source=E:\\workspace\\Test\\Matches.db;useutf16encoding=True")]
public string MatchesConnectionString {
get {
return ((string)(this["MatchesConnectionString"]));
}
set
{
(this["MatchesConnectionString"]) = value;
}
}
}
}
This is a klugey hack, but it works. Suggestions about how to clean this mess up are more than welcome.
brian
回答5:
DataGridView
takes a DataTable
as a basis. The DataTable
Columns save their Type as a property.
If this type is an Interface all you would see are empty cells.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/900112/datagridview-does-not-display-datatable