I was doing something like this:
SqlParameter param = new SqlParameter("@Param", 0) { SqlDbType = SqlDbType.Int };
private void TestParam(SqlParameter param) {
string test = param.Value.ToString(); // Getting NullReferenceException here
}
But I stop getting the exception when I put it like this:
SqlParameter param = new SqlParameter("@Param", SqlDbType.Int) { Value = 0 };
private void TestParam(SqlParameter param) {
string test = param.Value.ToString(); // Everything OK
}
Can anyone tell me why SqlParameter assumes 0 is the same as null?
Edit: MSDN Explains this here: SqlParameter Constructor
Use caution when you use this overload of the SqlParameter constructor to specify integer parameter values. Because this overload takes a value of type Object, you must convert the integral value to an Object type when the value is zero, as the following C# example demonstrates.
Parameter = new SqlParameter("@pname", Convert.ToInt32(0));
If you do not perform this conversion, the compiler assumes that you are trying to call the SqlParameter (string, SqlDbType) constructor overload.
Thanks Msdn :)
The 0 you are passing in is the type, not the value. 0 literals (and constant values) are allowed for any enum type - meaning the 0 of the underlying enum type, and are a better "match" than object, since it doesn't need boxing.
Personally, I would use;
Value = 0
perhaps in the object initializer.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5356862/sqlparameter-with-default-value-set-to-0-doesnt-work-as-expected