Why Sinatra request takes EM thread?

问题

Sinatra app receives requests for long running tasks and EM.defer them, launching them in EM's internal pool of 20 threads. When there are more than 20 EM.defer running, they are stored in EM's threadqueue by EM.defer.

However, it seems Sinatra won't service any requests until there is an EM thread available to handle them. My question is, isn't Sinatra suppose to use the reactor of the main thread to service all requests? Why am I seeing an add on the threadqueue when I make a new request?

Steps to reproduce:

Access /track/
Launch 30 /sleep/ reqs to fill the threadqueue
Access /ping/ and notice the add in the threadqueue as well as the delay

Code to reproduce it:

require 'sinatra'
#monkeypatch EM so we can access threadpools
module EventMachine 
  def self.queuedDefers 
    @threadqueue==nil ? 0: @threadqueue.size 
  end
  def self.availThreads 
    @threadqueue==nil ? 0: @threadqueue.num_waiting
  end
  def self.busyThreads 
    @threadqueue==nil ? 0: @threadpool_size - @threadqueue.num_waiting
  end   
end 
get '/track/?' do
  EM.add_periodic_timer(1) do 
    p "Busy: " + EventMachine.busyThreads.to_s + "/" +EventMachine.threadpool_size.to_s + ", Available: " + EventMachine.availThreads.to_s + "/" +EventMachine.threadpool_size.to_s + ", Queued: " + EventMachine.queuedDefers.to_s 
  end 
end

get '/sleep/?' do
  EM.defer(Proc.new {sleep 20}, Proc.new {body "DONE"})
end

get '/ping/?' do
  body "pong"
end

I tried the same thing on Rack/Thin (no Sinatra) and works as it's supposed to, so I guess Sinatra is causing it.

Ruby version: 1.9.3.p125
EventMachine: 1.0.0.beta.4.1
Sinatra: 1.3.2
OS: Windows

回答1:

Ok, so it seems Sinatra starts Thin in threaded mode by default causing the above behavior. You can add

set :threaded, false

in your Sinatra configure section and this will prevent the Reactor defering requests on a separate thread, and blocking when under load.

Source1

Source2

回答2:

Unless I'm misunderstanding something about your question, this is pretty much how EventMachine works. If you check out the docs for EM.defer, they state:

Don't write a deferred operation that will block forever. If so, the current implementation will not detect the problem, and the thread will never be returned to the pool. EventMachine limits the number of threads in its pool, so if you do this enough times, your subsequent deferred operations won't get a chance to run.

Basically, there's a finite number of threads, and if you use them up, any pending operations will block until a thread is available.

It might be possible to bump threadpool_size if you just need more threads, although ultimately that's not a long-term solution.

Is Sinatra multi threaded? is a really good question here on SO about Sinatra and threads. In short, Sinatra is awesome but if you need decent threading you might need to look elsewhere.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10881594/why-sinatra-request-takes-em-thread

标签

ruby

sinatra

eventmachine