Let's say I have a value pointed to by a (base,offset) tuple.
e.g.
class Data{
int x = 0;
}
class Accessor{
public Data data;
public Object base$x;
public long off$x;
public static final Unsafe unsafe;
public void run(){
data = new Data();
base$x = data;
off$x = 12;
unsafe.putInt(base$x,off$x,1);
assert(data.x == 1);
}
static{
try {
Constructor<Unsafe> unsafeConstructor = Unsafe.class.getDeclaredConstructor();
unsafeConstructor.setAccessible(true);
unsafe = unsafeConstructor.newInstance();
} catch (NoSuchMethodException | InvocationTargetException | IllegalAccessException | InstantiationException e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
}
(runnable version: https://ideone.com/OasQrh )
I now want to execute
unsafe.setInt(base$x,off$x,1);
in C
.
Why? Because a different process may move the data and changebase
and off
to point to the new location. I want to make use of intel RTM to make sure moving the data does not interfere with regular accesses to the field.
So let's create a new class
class Transactionally{
static{
System.loadLibrary("RTM_transact");
}
public static native void setInt(Object target, String fieldname);
}
and replace
class Accessor{
public Data data;
public Object base;
public long off;
public static final Unsafe unsafe;
public void run(){
data = new Data();
base$x = data;
off$x = 12;
Transactionally.setInt(this,"x",1);
assert(data.x == 1);
}
static{
try {
Constructor<Unsafe> unsafeConstructor = Unsafe.class.getDeclaredConstructor();
unsafeConstructor.setAccessible(true);
unsafe = unsafeConstructor.newInstance();
} catch (NoSuchMethodException | InvocationTargetException | IllegalAccessException | InstantiationException e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
}
we run this through javah to get the header, copy the method signatures to an RTM_transct.cpp
and get something like
#include<jni.h>
#include "rtmbenchmark_Transactionally.h"
#include <string>
std::string fldBase("base$");
std::string fldOff("off$");
/*
* Class: rtmbenchmark_Transactionally
* Method: setInt
* Signature: (Ljava/lang/Object;Ljava/lang/String;I)V
*/
JNIEXPORT void JNICALL Java_rtmbenchmark_Transactionally_setInt(JNIEnv *env, jclass _obsolete, jobject target, jstring fieldname, jint value){
jclass targetClass = (*env)->GetObjClass(env,target);
jfieldID fidFLDbase = (*env)->GetFieldID(env, targetClass, fldBase + fieldname, "Ljava.lang.Object");
jfieldid fidFLDoff = (*env)->GetFieldID(env, targetClass, fldOff + fieldname, "J");
volatile int tries = 0;
volatile boolean success = 0;
while(!success){/*TODO: maybe switch to a different strategy when tries grows too large?*/
__asm__ __volatile__ (
"xbegin 1f" /*1f: local label 1, look forward to find first*/
:"+rm"(tries) /*artificial dependency to prevent re-ordering*/
);
++tries;
jobject base = (*env)->GetIntField(env,targetClass,fidFLDbase);
jlong offset = (*env)->GetLongField(env,targetClass,fidFLDoff);
//??? ==> unsafe.setLong(base,offset,value)
__asm__ __volatile__ (
"xend\n\t"
"incl %0\n" /*increment success ==> break out of loop*/
"jmp 2f\n" /*jump to end of loop*/
"1:\n\t" /*local label 1 (jumped to when transaction is aborted)*/
"2:" /*local label 2 (jumped to after transaction succeeded)*/
:"+rm"(success)
:"rm"(tries) /*artificial dependency*/
);
}
}
What do I use for unsafe, in the transaction body?
The "heart" of the transaction are these three lines that (are supposed to) correspond to what Accessor used to do:
jobject base = (*env)->GetIntField(env,targetClass,fidFLDbase);
jlong offset = (*env)->GetLongField(env,targetClass,fidFLDoff);
//??? ==> unsafe.setInt(base,offset,value)
)
Ideally, of course, I'd like to do something akin to base[offset] = value
, but I very much doubt that would work.
What do I put here for unsafe.setInt?
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47220275/how-to-use-unsafe-in-jni