testing

问题 The pImpl idiom in c++ aims to hide the implementation details (=private members) of a class from the users of that class. However it also hides some of the dependencies of that class which is usually regarded bad from a testing point of view. For example if class A hides its implementation details in Class AImpl which is only accessible from A.cpp and AImpl depends on a lot of other classes, it becomes very difficult to unit test class A since the testing framework has no access to the

问题 What is the difference between smoke testing and sanity testing? When do will perform smoke testing and when do will perform sanity testing? 回答1: Sanity testing Sanity testing is the subset of regression testing and it is performed when we do not have enough time for doing testing. Sanity testing is the surface level testing where QA engineer verifies that all the menus, functions, commands available in the product and project are working fine. Example For example, in a project there are 5

问题 I've got a request that returns a list of responses in two possible structures, depending on the 'status'. { "listSize": 2, "itemList": [ { "id": , "Name": "", "submittedOn": "", "Reference": null, "status": "Receipted", "response": null }, { "id": 12345, "submittedOn": "", "Reference": null, "status": "Failed", "response": { "xml": "", "formErrors": [ { "error_type": "", "error_location":"", "error_message": "", } ] } }, ] } I need to check the structure for the status being either

问题 I've got a request that returns a list of responses in two possible structures, depending on the 'status'. { "listSize": 2, "itemList": [ { "id": , "Name": "", "submittedOn": "", "Reference": null, "status": "Receipted", "response": null }, { "id": 12345, "submittedOn": "", "Reference": null, "status": "Failed", "response": { "xml": "", "formErrors": [ { "error_type": "", "error_location":"", "error_message": "", } ] } }, ] } I need to check the structure for the status being either

问题 it's my first time using JUNIT and I literally cannot get it to work. I've got a person class, in which has firstName and lastName, and a test class in which I need to test the methods. Everytime I attempt to test one though, if i've wrote a test for the particular method, it fails. Here is my code. Person Class public class Person { private String firstName; private String lastName; public Person (String a, String b) { firstName = a; lastName = b; } public String getfirstName() { return

问题 it's my first time using JUNIT and I literally cannot get it to work. I've got a person class, in which has firstName and lastName, and a test class in which I need to test the methods. Everytime I attempt to test one though, if i've wrote a test for the particular method, it fails. Here is my code. Person Class public class Person { private String firstName; private String lastName; public Person (String a, String b) { firstName = a; lastName = b; } public String getfirstName() { return

问题 I have been struggling with importing unit test results and code coverage from Jenkins into SonarQube. At this point, I have verified the results are being generated as they are displayed in the project's page in Jenkins. The sonar.properties file is shown below. The php results were created with phpunit and the code coverage was created with phpunit and clover. As an effort in troubleshooting, I included both sonar.php.coverage.reportPath and sonar.clover.reportPath. sonar.projectKey

问题 I have been struggling with importing unit test results and code coverage from Jenkins into SonarQube. At this point, I have verified the results are being generated as they are displayed in the project's page in Jenkins. The sonar.properties file is shown below. The php results were created with phpunit and the code coverage was created with phpunit and clover. As an effort in troubleshooting, I included both sonar.php.coverage.reportPath and sonar.clover.reportPath. sonar.projectKey

问题 While being a web developer for over 3 years, I now realize that I know nothing about browsers and that they can differ in many aspects from each other as day & night. As an illustration to this,- I've tried to construct somewhat a "fair-test" for profiling a JavaScript parity check code, which version of it runs faster, this x => (x%2)==0 or that x => (x&1)==0 . I suspect that checking only right-most bit, should be faster way, but in a browser world ... you may never know. Here's a complete

问题 I'm trying to create a test using TestCafe/JavaScript that will compare a website's top menu text/links to the expected data stored in a config. I have some experience with TestCafe, but am still learning. When I set up the function and call it, I enter the function but not the loop within it, as evidenced by the console.log inside of the FOR loop not being printed to the console. I've been debugging this for a while and cannot figure it out. URL: https://wdwthemeparks.com Config file