sql-server-2008-r2

The Component “XML Source” Was unable to process the XML data. ambiguous complextype definition. The Element '%' has multiple members named '%'

情到浓时终转凉″ 提交于 2021-02-20 02:52:46
问题 I am trying to load the XMl file using SSIS. I have My Sample XML and corresponding XSD. In my SSIS package XML Soruce, provided the Input XML File path and XSD path and when i am tryng to see the columns then i was getting the below error The Component "XML Source" Was unable to process the XML data. ambiguous complextype definition. The Element 'childusages' has multiple members named 'usages' And i tried validating the XML and corresponding XSD with .Net(C# or VB) and it passed the

The Component “XML Source” Was unable to process the XML data. ambiguous complextype definition. The Element '%' has multiple members named '%'

邮差的信 提交于 2021-02-20 02:51:10
问题 I am trying to load the XMl file using SSIS. I have My Sample XML and corresponding XSD. In my SSIS package XML Soruce, provided the Input XML File path and XSD path and when i am tryng to see the columns then i was getting the below error The Component "XML Source" Was unable to process the XML data. ambiguous complextype definition. The Element 'childusages' has multiple members named 'usages' And i tried validating the XML and corresponding XSD with .Net(C# or VB) and it passed the

Automatically generate a user defined table type that matches an existing table

巧了我就是萌 提交于 2021-02-18 05:16:44
问题 I have several tables that already exist in my database. Some of them have quite a few columns. I want to make some stored procedures to do a merge statement with these tables. To do that I would like the parameter of the stored procedure to be a User Defined Table type. I can go script out each table and modify it to a User Defined Table Type Creation statement. But what I would really like is a way to generate a user defined table type off an existing table in my database. I could then add

Automatically generate a user defined table type that matches an existing table

本秂侑毒 提交于 2021-02-18 05:16:29
问题 I have several tables that already exist in my database. Some of them have quite a few columns. I want to make some stored procedures to do a merge statement with these tables. To do that I would like the parameter of the stored procedure to be a User Defined Table type. I can go script out each table and modify it to a User Defined Table Type Creation statement. But what I would really like is a way to generate a user defined table type off an existing table in my database. I could then add

SQL select where not in select statement

筅森魡賤 提交于 2021-02-11 17:46:09
问题 I'm trying to Select all the records in my database that don't exist in a subquery. For some reason it returns nothing even though the sub query returns 2000 or so rows on it's own and the main query returns over 5000. I need all the records that aren't contained in the subquery SELECT ID FROM PART WHERE NOT ID IN ( SELECT DOCUMENT_ID AS ID FROM USER_DEF_FIELDS WHERE PROGRAM_ID = 'VMPRTMNT' AND ID = 'UDF-0000029' ) 回答1: This is better written as a correlated NOT EXISTS subquery. SELECT ID

Trying to create an SQL Query that will max all CPUs to 100%

眉间皱痕 提交于 2021-02-07 17:31:17
问题 As part of a stress tests I'm doing I'm trying to figure out if there is an SQL query (quite specifically SQL Server query) that will max all CPUs usage to 100% or close enough. Suggestions anyone? 回答1: SELECT SUM(CONVERT(BIGINT, o1.object_id) + CONVERT(BIGINT, o2.object_id) + CONVERT(BIGINT, o3.object_id) + CONVERT(BIGINT, o4.object_id)) FROM sys.objects o1 CROSS JOIN sys.objects o2 CROSS JOIN sys.objects o3 CROSS JOIN sys.objects o4 Here's a parallel version: USE master SELECT MyInt =

Trying to create an SQL Query that will max all CPUs to 100%

好久不见. 提交于 2021-02-07 17:30:01
问题 As part of a stress tests I'm doing I'm trying to figure out if there is an SQL query (quite specifically SQL Server query) that will max all CPUs usage to 100% or close enough. Suggestions anyone? 回答1: SELECT SUM(CONVERT(BIGINT, o1.object_id) + CONVERT(BIGINT, o2.object_id) + CONVERT(BIGINT, o3.object_id) + CONVERT(BIGINT, o4.object_id)) FROM sys.objects o1 CROSS JOIN sys.objects o2 CROSS JOIN sys.objects o3 CROSS JOIN sys.objects o4 Here's a parallel version: USE master SELECT MyInt =

Weird "OLE DB provider 'STREAM' for linked server '(null)' returned invalid data for column '[!BulkInsert].Value' error

白昼怎懂夜的黑 提交于 2021-02-07 11:24:59
问题 Software used: Windows 7 64 bit Ultimate, .Net 4, SQL Server 2008 R2. select @@version returns: Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 (RTM) - 10.50.1617.0 (X64) Apr 22 2011 19:23:43 Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation Developer Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.1 <X64> (Build 7601: Service Pack 1) (Hypervisor) To reproduce, and assuming you have a local sql server 2008 R2 instance, paste the following code in linqpad and run it as a Program. It blows up with: OLE DB provider 'STREAM' for linked server

Weird "OLE DB provider 'STREAM' for linked server '(null)' returned invalid data for column '[!BulkInsert].Value' error

岁酱吖の 提交于 2021-02-07 11:24:54
问题 Software used: Windows 7 64 bit Ultimate, .Net 4, SQL Server 2008 R2. select @@version returns: Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 (RTM) - 10.50.1617.0 (X64) Apr 22 2011 19:23:43 Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation Developer Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.1 <X64> (Build 7601: Service Pack 1) (Hypervisor) To reproduce, and assuming you have a local sql server 2008 R2 instance, paste the following code in linqpad and run it as a Program. It blows up with: OLE DB provider 'STREAM' for linked server

Split column data into multiple rows

泄露秘密 提交于 2021-02-07 09:34:49
问题 I have data currently in my table like below under currently section. I need the selected column data which is comma delimited to be converted into the format marked in green (Read and write of a category together) Any ways to do it in SQL Server? Please do look at the proposal data carefully.... Maybe I wasn't clear before: this isn't merely the splitting that is the issue but to group all reads and writes of a category together(sometimes they are just merely reads/writes), it's not merely