scalatest

Mockito's Answer in ScalaTest

由 本小妞迷上赌 提交于 2020-08-24 06:44:09
问题 Is there some alternative to Mockito's Answer in ScalaTest? I was going through its documentation, but didn't find anything. I would like to, for example, execute some logic on arguments of a stubbed method. In Mockito, I would do something like this: when(mock.create(any(A.class))).thenAnswer(new Answer() { Object answer(InvocationOnMock invocation) { A firstArg = (A) invocation.getArguments()[0]; firstArg.callMethod(); return null; } }); In ScalaTest, I'm fine with using Mockito, as well.

Cannot Find GeneratorDrivenPropertyChecks Trait

由 妖精的绣舞 提交于 2020-06-28 04:57:34
问题 I have these test dependencies defined / Test Dependencies lazy val wiremock = "com.github.tomakehurst" % "wiremock-jre8" % "2.25.1" lazy val playTest = "com.typesafe.play" %% "play-test" % "2.8.1" lazy val scalaTestPlusPlay = "org.scalatestplus.play" %% "scalatestplus-play" % "5.1.0" lazy val mockito = "org.mockito" %% "mockito-scala" % "1.10.2" lazy val scalamock = "org.scalamock" %% "scalamock" % "4.4.0" lazy val scalacheck_shapeless = "com.github.alexarchambault" %% "scalacheck-shapeless

Cannot Find GeneratorDrivenPropertyChecks Trait

由 寵の児 提交于 2020-06-28 04:57:17
问题 I have these test dependencies defined / Test Dependencies lazy val wiremock = "com.github.tomakehurst" % "wiremock-jre8" % "2.25.1" lazy val playTest = "com.typesafe.play" %% "play-test" % "2.8.1" lazy val scalaTestPlusPlay = "org.scalatestplus.play" %% "scalatestplus-play" % "5.1.0" lazy val mockito = "org.mockito" %% "mockito-scala" % "1.10.2" lazy val scalamock = "org.scalamock" %% "scalamock" % "4.4.0" lazy val scalacheck_shapeless = "com.github.alexarchambault" %% "scalacheck-shapeless

Why my Scala Async test never completes when I do Await.result?

由 …衆ロ難τιáo~ 提交于 2020-06-27 17:11:19
问题 I have created a simple test scenario that shows this: class Test extends AsyncFunSuite { test("async test") { val f = Future { val thread = new Thread { override def run(): Unit = { println("OKAYY") } } thread.start() } Await.result(f, Duration.Inf) Future { assert(true) } } } When executing this, the test runs forever and never completes. 回答1: You will see the same behavior with all asynchronous testing in ScalaTest (AsyncFeatureSpec, AsyncFlatSpec, AsyncFreeSpec, AsyncFunSpec,

Scalatest Asynchronous Test Suites vs Eventually and WhenReady (org.scalatest.concurrent)

由 时间秒杀一切 提交于 2020-06-12 05:22:09
问题 I'm trying to use scalatest Asynchronous Test Suites, but aside from some restrictions over setting timeout and what not, I don't see what does the test suite actually add. I wonder if anyone versed into asynchronous testing with scalatest could quickly explain the differences between Asynchronous Test Suites and org.scalatest.concurrent . What do async test suites actually add over org.scalatest.concurrent ? Is one approach better over the other? 回答1: We compare the following ScalaTest

Scalatest Asynchronous Test Suites vs Eventually and WhenReady (org.scalatest.concurrent)

由 て烟熏妆下的殇ゞ 提交于 2020-06-12 05:21:25
问题 I'm trying to use scalatest Asynchronous Test Suites, but aside from some restrictions over setting timeout and what not, I don't see what does the test suite actually add. I wonder if anyone versed into asynchronous testing with scalatest could quickly explain the differences between Asynchronous Test Suites and org.scalatest.concurrent . What do async test suites actually add over org.scalatest.concurrent ? Is one approach better over the other? 回答1: We compare the following ScalaTest

What's the difference between shouldBe vs shouldEqual in Scala?

由 半城伤御伤魂 提交于 2020-03-18 10:52:35
问题 When should I be using shouldBe and when should I be using shouldEqual? port shouldEqual 8000 port shouldBe 8000 回答1: From http://www.scalatest.org/user_guide/using_matchers#checkingEqualityWithMatchers: result shouldEqual 3 // can customize equality, no parentheses required result shouldBe 3 // cannot customize equality, so fastest to compile, no parentheses required The first one takes an implicit Equality[T] to verify the computed value with the expected value, the second one doesn't. So

JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA 2019 for Mac(Java的IDE工具) v2019.3.3中文版

由 ε祈祈猫儿з 提交于 2020-02-27 10:51:46
[名称]：JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA 2019 for Mac [大小]： 814.3 MB [语言]：中文 [测试环境]： Mac OS 10.15.x [下载链接]：https://www.macdown.com/mac/573.html 简介 intellij idea mac被认为是最好的java开发工具之一，IntelliJ IDEA支持自定义UI主题，自定义UI主题使设计人员能够控制内置IntelliJ IDEA UI元素的外观， 为插件创建新的UI元素与自定义UI主题明显不同。 JetBrAIns IntelliJ IDEA 2019 for Mac软件特色介绍 深入了解您的代码 IntelliJ IDEA分析您的代码，在所有项目文件和语言中查找符号之间的连接。利用这些信息，它提供了深入的编码协助，快速导航，巧妙的错误分析，当然还有重构。 智能完成 ^⇧Space为您提供当前上下文中适用的最相关符号的列表。这个和其他完成项目不断向您学习，将最常用的类和包的成员移动到建议列表的顶部，以便您可以更快地选择它们。 连锁完成 比Smart Completion深入一点，并在当前上下文中列出可通过方法或获取者访问的适用符号。假设你正在寻找价值Project 并且只有Module module声明。按^⇧Space两次获得module.getProject(

Can ScalaTest generate a single HTML report for all subprojects?

由 ぐ巨炮叔叔 提交于 2020-01-31 13:28:11
问题 I am trying to use ScalaTest (with Scala 2.11.0 and SBT 0.13.x) to generate a single HTML report for a project with many sub projects. To do this, I put the following line in my build.sbt: testOptions in ThisBuild += Tests.Argument(TestFrameworks.ScalaTest, "-h", "target/test-reports") And I have included the pegdown library that is needed for this facility... libraryDependencies in ThisBuild ++= Seq( "org.scalatest" %% "scalatest" % "2.1.7" % "test", "org.pegdown" % "pegdown" % "1.4.2" %

Can ScalaTest generate a single HTML report for all subprojects?

由 柔情痞子 提交于 2020-01-31 13:24:58
问题 I am trying to use ScalaTest (with Scala 2.11.0 and SBT 0.13.x) to generate a single HTML report for a project with many sub projects. To do this, I put the following line in my build.sbt: testOptions in ThisBuild += Tests.Argument(TestFrameworks.ScalaTest, "-h", "target/test-reports") And I have included the pegdown library that is needed for this facility... libraryDependencies in ThisBuild ++= Seq( "org.scalatest" %% "scalatest" % "2.1.7" % "test", "org.pegdown" % "pegdown" % "1.4.2" %
订阅 scalatest