row-level-security

does anybody knows about Java/C# database independent authorization library. This library should support read, write, delete, insert actions across company organizational structure. Something like this: - user can see all documents - user can enter new document assigned to his unit - user can change all documents assigned to his unit and all subordinate units. - user can delete documents that are assigned to him I should also be able to create custom actions (besides read, write,...) connect them to certain class and assign that "security token" to user (e.g. document.expire). If there aren't

I want the rows in a table accessible to only members of groups. I create users and add them to group by following method, CREATE USER abc LOGIN PASSWORD 'securedpassword1'; CREATE USER xyz LOGIN PASSWORD 'securedpassword2'; ALTER GROUP permanent ADD USER abc; Then the policy I write makes it accessible to only current user. But I need whole group to access it. CREATE TABLE table_Workers ( worID INT ,worName CHARACTER VARYING ,pgUser CHARACTER VARYING ); INSERT INTO table_Workers VALUES (1,'Jason','abc'),(2,'Roy','abc'),(3,'Johny','abc') ,(4,'Jane','xyz'),(5,'Kane','xyz'),(6,'Stuart','xyz');

I need strict control of the reading and writing of my Postgres data. Updatable views have always provided very good, strict, control of the reading of my data and allows me to add valuable computed columns. With Postgres 9.5 row level security has introduced a new and powerful way to control my data. But I can't use both technologies views, and row level security together. Why? Basically because it wasn't possible to retroactively change how views work. I'd like to be able to support SECURITY INVOKER (or equivalent) for views but as far as I know no such feature presently exists. You can

I have a table, customer on which I did the following: ALTER TABLE customer FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY; CREATE POLICY customer_rls ON customer USING (false); However, doing SELECT * FROM customer still returns all the rows. The current role is myrole \dg myrole List of roles Role name | Attributes | Member of -----------+------------+----------- my_role | | {} As you can see it's not a superuser and it RLS isn't disabled on it. What am I doing wrong? You forgot to enable row level security for the table. ALTER TABLE customer enable ROW LEVEL SECURITY; force only makes sure that RLS is applied if

Is there something new about row-level security in SQL Server 2012? In 2008 and below the only way was using Views, in 2012 they announced something like Row Level Security in Tabular Models , does this have any relation to RLS over tables? Are there any news on RLS in 2012 in general? There is still no support out of the box. There are a white paper, Implementing Row- and Cell-Level Security in Classified Databases and an accompanying toolkit you can use to implement RLS, CLS based on labels, which were updated to cover SQL Server 2012. 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11136109/row

I am currently evaluating authentication / authorization frameworks. Apache Shiro seems to be very nice but I am missing row-level security features. E.g. there might be special rows in a database which should only visible and accessible by users with special privileges. To avoid unnecessary round-trips, we currently modify the SQL queries to join with our authorization data to get only the visible rows for the current user. But this concepts doesn't feel 'right' to me, because we mix business code with security related code which should be orthogonal and independent from each other. What

One of the very important problems in information softwares is the existence of users with different roles with different duties and access levels. For instance, think of an organization with the structure (hierarchy) like below: [Organization Role ] [Organization ID] CEO org01 Financial Assistant org0101 personnel 1 Software Assistant org0102 personnel 2 Commercial Assistant org0103 personnel 3 Imagine that this organization has a system that manages personnel’s information. The rule of showing personnel’s information in this system is that each user can see personnel’s information of the