rhino-mocks

问题 I would like to test the following class but I/O and sealed class dependencies are making it quite hard. public class ImageDrawingCombiner { /// <summary> /// Save image to a specified location in path /// </summary> /// <param name="path">Location to save the image</param> /// <param name="surface">The image as canvas</param> public void CombineDrawingsIntoImage(Uri path, Canvas surface) { Size size = new Size(surface.ActualWidth, surface.ActualHeight); // Create a render bitmap and push the

问题 I'm trying to write a test can I mock a HttpRequestBase to return post values like this? How can I achieve this? var collection = new NameValueCollection(); collection.Add("Id", "1"); collection.Add("UserName", ""); var mocks = new MockRepository(); using (mocks.Record()) { Expect.Call(requestBase.Params).Return(collection); } Basically I have a requirement that rquires me to mock request post parameters as opposed to form values as the UI client is not a html form, any ideas how to fake/mock

问题 As I understand it, a mock object created with RhinoMocks enter the recording state directly when it is created, and then you call Replay() to enter the replay state. I would like to manually decide when the mock object starts recording, or be able to pause the recording. Would that be possible in RhinoMocks? Thanks /Erik 回答1: Mocks are either in record or replay mode. They can't be in a "nothing" mode. If you don't want to use the AAA syntax and you want to control the record/replay state

问题 I'm having problems to test a method that has a ref parameter. I'm not the library/code owner, so I can't change it, so please do not suggest that I remove the ref parameter. I'm using this website as reference: http://ayende.com/wiki/Rhino%20Mocks%203.5.ashx#OutandRefarguments Here is the test: [Test] public void TestBuildSimpleProfile() { // arrange var barMock = MockRepository.GenerateStrictMock<ICommandBar>(); var controlBuilder = new ControlBuilder(barMock); var user = new Usuario();

问题 We are not able to mock this class in RhinoMocks. public class Service { public Service(Command[] commands){} } public abstract class Command {} // Code var mock = MockRepository.GenerateMock<Service>(new Command[]{}); // or mock = MockRepository.GenerateMock<Service>(null) Rhino mocks fails complaining that it cannot find a constructor with matching arguments. What am I doing wrong? Thanks, 回答1: Try like this: var mock = MockRepository.GenerateMock<Service>( new object[] { new Command[0] } )

问题 For some objects I want to create default stubs so that common properties contains values. But in some cases I want to override my default behaviour. My question is, can I somehow overwrite an already stubbed value? //First I create the default stub with a default value var foo = MockRepository.GenerateStub<IFoo>(); foo.Stub(x => x.TheValue).Return(1); //Somewhere else in the code I override the stubbed value foo.Stub(x => x.TheValue).Return(2); Assert.AreEqual(2, foo.TheValue); //Fails,

问题 I know a similar question has been asked but I have not found a clear solution. I'm trying to mock a private field from a large class. The private field gets instantiated in some earlier method and I'm trying to unit test a latter method which references the field. So I have an earlier method in my class: public bool validateAll(ref DataEntry[] oEntries, string sMediaPlanId, ITemplateGenerator oTempGen) { ... // private field that I am trying to mock this._sMediaPlanObjective = (MPWrapper

问题 The particular class I'm testing depends upon the HttpSessionState object. The HttpSessionState class has no public constructors. The class under test is only using this object as a NameValue store. The class is used in an ASMX web service to return information for a particular method. I'm thinking about creating a facade around the HttpSessionState class where I can provide a Dictionary <string, string> instead of the Session object in testing. Is this a good idea or standard practice? 回答1:

问题 I have a method on an interface that looks like this and I want to stub it with Rhino Mocks: TValue GetPropertyOfExistingObject<TValue>(long id, Expression<Func<T, TValue>> propertyExpression); My code that does the stubbing looks like this: var service = MockRepository.GenerateStub<IQuoteService>(); service.Stub(s => s.GetPropertyOfExistingObject(1, q => q.QuoteNumber)).Return(1234); Notice that one of the parameters in that method is an Expression<Func<T1, T2>> , and this stub is not

问题 Hey people... trying to get my mocking sorted with asp.net MVC. I've found this example on the net using Moq, basically I'm understanding it to say: when ApplyAppPathModifier is called, return the value that was passed to it. I cant figure out how to do this in Rhino Mocks, any thoughts? var response = new Mock<HttpResponseBase>(); response.Expect(res => res.ApplyAppPathModifier(It.IsAny<string>())) .Returns((string virtualPath) => virtualPath); 回答1: If you are using the stub method as