revert

SVN Synchronize vs Update to Head (subclipse)

此生再无相见时 提交于 2019-12-02 14:42:51
I'm fairly new to both Subversion and Subclipse and am seeing some issues that lead me to believe there is a difference between updating to head, and synchronizing. Specifically I find that when I try to revert (using the subclipse history), I often get a message saying "Cannot reverse merge a range from a path's own future history, try updating first". My synchronize should ensure that I have the 'head' version of all the files in my branch on the REPO, but doing an "Update to head" does fix the issue... so what gives? I've tried to check the SVN console to see what's changing, but it's not

Does git revert also use the 3-way-merge?

可紊 提交于 2019-12-02 10:39:49
问题 When I run git revert , it can happen, that a conflict occurs. Does git rely on the 3-way-merge, as it is depicted in the question merge internals (cf. table below) also for revert ? What is the merge base for a revert? In What are the three files in a 3-way merge for interactive rebasing using git and meld? it is quite clear, but its hard to imagine this for a revert. A - B - C - D - C^-1 (If I want to revert C at the end.) 回答1: Yes, there is a base. (Side note: this code has changed a lot

svn: How to revert somebody else's commit?

断了今生、忘了曾经 提交于 2019-12-02 08:47:46
Argh, somebody (OK, my boss) added and commited all the files in his directory, meaning all the svn files: conf/, db/, format, hooks/, locks/... I'm using Tortoise, so I tried clicking on each one and doing revert, it said OK, but I still see all of them under version control after update/commit. We are now several versions past that. How do I clean things up ? Thanks In Subversion, "revert" means to undo uncommitted changes to a working copy. What you're looking to do is to (effectively) undo a commit. This is normally done in Subversion with a reverse merge Assuming that your boss did

Git merge, then revert, then revert the revert

ⅰ亾dé卋堺 提交于 2019-11-30 20:23:38
So we've gotten a git branch into a tricky state: Two branches: * master * other_branch Last week someone accidentally merged other_branch (prematurely) onto master and pushed to origin. We noticed the error and I, in my naivete, committed git revert bad_merge_commit to "fix" the problem. Everything looked ok, we moved on with our lives... Today we attempted to merge master into other_branch as a step towards bringing other_branch into master. But my revert seems to have caused a nightmare. When master merges into other_branch, all (most?) of the work on other_branch is deleted. I presume this

jQuery.draggable() - Revert on button click

廉价感情. 提交于 2019-11-30 09:55:21
I have several draggable & droppable elements on my page, which have accept properties. Currently my code is set up like: $(".answer." + answer).draggable({ revert: "invalid" , snap: ".graph" }); $(".graph." + graph).droppable({ accept: ".answer." + answer }); Therefore if the answer isn't correct, its reverted to its original position. The user also needs the ability to reset all on the page. I've tried the following, but it doesn't work: $("btnReset").click(function(){ $(".graph.A").draggable({revert:true}); }); Since there's no built-in method to do what you need, you'd have to simulate the

reverting push'd git commit

天大地大妈咪最大 提交于 2019-11-30 09:02:29
I've got a repo with two branches-- master and dev. I was working on the master branch and pulled, and got a message that the repo was up to date. I committed my changes, and pushed to the remote repo (on github). I got a message saying that some changes were rejected. I then did a git pull origin dev , which apparently was the wrong thing to do-- since it merged the dev branch with my master, and like an idiot I didn't notice this until I'd already pushed again. So the last commit shows Merge branch 'dev' of github.com:myuser/myrepo . I can get back to the last known good status on my local

Git merge, then revert, then revert the revert

笑着哭i 提交于 2019-11-30 04:21:58
问题 So we've gotten a git branch into a tricky state: Two branches: * master * other_branch Last week someone accidentally merged other_branch (prematurely) onto master and pushed to origin. We noticed the error and I, in my naivete, committed git revert bad_merge_commit to "fix" the problem. Everything looked ok, we moved on with our lives... Today we attempted to merge master into other_branch as a step towards bringing other_branch into master. But my revert seems to have caused a nightmare.

Revert changes made by merge

♀尐吖头ヾ 提交于 2019-11-30 02:57:19
The developer was commiting small changes to two files. But during this commit, he had a merge conflict which deleted a lot of stuff (probably didn't have the last up to date version). Then it was pushed to the shared repo and some other developers did some other commits. Now, we noticed, that the merge deleted the important files, and we want to revert it back. How can I do this without losing the changes from the next commits? I was trying to git revert commitsha , but it didn't bring the changes back. Do I need to revert back the mergesha ? How can I determine it? git revert --mainline

Reverting to a previous revision using TortoiseSVN

旧时模样 提交于 2019-11-29 20:57:59
What is the easiest way to revert my working copy to a previous revision using Windows TortoiseSVN ? I did not find any "findable" command to do that quickly. Stefan There are several ways to do that. But do not just update to the earlier revision as suggested here . The easiest way to revert the changes from a single revision, or from a range of revisions, is to use the revision log dialog. This is also the method to use of you want to discard recent changes and make an earlier revision the new HEAD. Select the file or folder in which you need to revert the changes. If you want to revert all

Reverting specific commits from git

南楼画角 提交于 2019-11-29 20:35:15
I have a git tree with a lot of commits and a lot of files. Now, I want to revert specific commits that touch a file only. To explain: > git init Initialized empty Git repository in /home/psankar/specific/.git/ > echo "File a" > a > git add a ; git commit -m "File a" [master (root-commit) 5267c21] File a 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) create mode 100644 a > echo "File b" > b > git add b; git commit -m "File b" [master 7b560ae] File b 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) create mode 100644 b > echo "File c" > c > git add c; git commit -m "File c" [master fd6c132] File c 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)