quirks-mode

How to select Document Mode in Firefox and Chrome without setting a DOCTYPE?

时光毁灭记忆、已成空白 提交于 2019-12-10 17:32:45
问题 I am working on converting a web page that was creating using old web standards to support modern web browsers. The web page currently renders in Quirks Mode within Internet Explorer 9, Firefox, and Chrome. In IE9, I am able to select the "Document Mode" in which I would like the web page I am viewing to render in. This makes things easier, as I can jump between Quirks Mode and IE9 Standards Mode. I do not have to add/modify the DOCTYPE tag within the code of the web page. Can I do the same

QuirksMode & JavaScript Implementation

╄→尐↘猪︶ㄣ 提交于 2019-12-10 10:15:42
问题 I would like to ask if Internet Explorer in QuirksMode has a different JavaScript implementation than IE in a normal mode (when doctype is correctly defined). Is it possible that a JavaScript code will behave in a different way in QuirksMode and in normal IE mode? 回答1: Yep . One of the most noticeable differences is that in quirks mode, BODY (document.body) is considered to be root element , whereas in standard mode (and the way it's meant to be) - root element is HTML (document

Difference between quirks mode and standards mode JavaScript

吃可爱长大的小学妹 提交于 2019-12-08 03:07:53
问题 Are there any differences in the JavaScript of these two modes in IE 9? If yes, what are they? 回答1: IE9 standards document mode supports ECMAScript, Fifth Edition features, so the method such as forEach , every , map of Array and defineProperty , keys of Object are support well. more about IE9 standards document mode supports enhanced DOM programmability. (may not what you're interested in, but it does so). more about IE9 removes some of the key differences between IE8 JavaScript

What exactly is “IE5 quirks” in IE 10 Developer Tools? [duplicate]

[亡魂溺海] 提交于 2019-12-07 05:52:19
问题 This question already has answers here : Closed 6 years ago . Possible Duplicate: Does the windows 8 internet explorer 10 still have quirksmode? I'm working on a website which we're trying to get to work in IE10. In this site we have an iframe which is breaking when we're using IE5 quirksmode which we really need for the main site to work, for some reason we can't just use the Quirks document mode in IE10, because then the main site wont work. So what the heck is IE5 quirks and is it the same

Difference between quirks mode and standards mode JavaScript

[亡魂溺海] 提交于 2019-12-06 13:33:50
Are there any differences in the JavaScript of these two modes in IE 9? If yes, what are they? wiky IE9 standards document mode supports ECMAScript, Fifth Edition features , so the method such as forEach , every , map of Array and defineProperty , keys of Object are support well. more about IE9 standards document mode supports enhanced DOM programmability. (may not what you're interested in, but it does so). more about IE9 removes some of the key differences between IE8 JavaScript implementation and the ECMAScript, Third Edition Specification . Quirks mode supports the JavaScript functionality

MSIE8 compatibility mode not rendering dynamically created table

China☆狼群 提交于 2019-12-04 17:49:35
A bit weird... ...if running in IE8 quirks mode or in compatibility view mode, the table added by the following code doesn't render. Can anyone tell me why, because it is not obvious to me..? <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <script> function AddTable() { var table = document.createElement('table'); var row = document.createElement('tr'); table.appendChild(row); var cell = document.createElement('td'); cell.innerHTML='abc'; row.appendChild(cell); var divContainer = document.getElementById('divContainer'); divContainer.appendChild(table); } </script> </head> <body> <div id=

Is quirks mode relevant in 2011?

一笑奈何 提交于 2019-12-04 03:09:07
问题 With all the latest browsers like IE9, FF4, ever updating chrome, etc., do we still need quirks mode? If yes where is it useful? In which scenario? 回答1: No. You should never use quirks mode. It ceased to be of any relevance once IE 5.0 and 5.5 stopped being used. Those were the last browsers which did not support standards mode, so any sites which needed to include support for them would have needed to be able to work in quirks mode. However, IE6 along with all versions of all browsers

Weird bug when combining an ASP.NET updatepanel with the jQuery UI DatePicker

纵然是瞬间 提交于 2019-12-03 09:45:34
问题 I've created a page which combines an inline jQuery UI datepicker . I wan't to initiate a callback to the updatepanel when the user clicks a new date to update some data. Now, this page has multiple updatepanels (don't ask :) ), so I need to check which updatepanel did the reload in order to do some stuff clientside. I'm using __doPostBack to do the postback and Sys.WebForms.PageRequestManager.getInstance().add_endRequest(function(sender, args) {} to listen for when an update is done. The

Which mode is IE6 if doctype is html as HTML5?

半城伤御伤魂 提交于 2019-12-03 04:23:03
问题 If web page has doctype as HTML5. <!doctype html> Which render mode is it for IE6? The document.compatMode tells CSS1Compat . It looks Standard mode, not quirks mode. But, is it true? IE6 is released before HTML5 term is coined. How can IE6 recognize HTML5 doctype? 回答1: The HTML5 doctype was specifically chosen because it was the shortest doctype string possible that triggered standards mode in all browsers (starting with IE6). This was a deliberate decision based on what what would work in

Weird bug when combining an ASP.NET updatepanel with the jQuery UI DatePicker

╄→尐↘猪︶ㄣ 提交于 2019-12-03 00:18:37
I've created a page which combines an inline jQuery UI datepicker . I wan't to initiate a callback to the updatepanel when the user clicks a new date to update some data. Now, this page has multiple updatepanels (don't ask :) ), so I need to check which updatepanel did the reload in order to do some stuff clientside. I'm using __doPostBack to do the postback and Sys.WebForms.PageRequestManager.getInstance().add_endRequest(function(sender, args) {} to listen for when an update is done. The problem is that in FF the callback tells me that it's not an async operation, and the data I need to have