public

I have included a user control in another statically following code : place the folowing directive in the asp code of the parent page or usercontrol: <%@ Register src="Name_of_your_child_control.ascx" tagname="Name_of_your_child_control" tagprefix="uc1" %> use the following tag in the asp-code of the parent page/control: <uc1:Name_of_your_child_control ID="Name_of_your_child_control1" runat="server" /> ..... But the issue is...i am not able to access the public properties of user control which got included(child user control) in given user control(parent user control)... Please help :( Say

Ruby as an Object Oriented Language. What that means is whatever message I send, I strictly send it on some object/instance of class. Example: class Test def test1 puts "I am in test1. A public method" self.test2 end def test2 puts "I am in test2. A public Method" end end makes sense I call method test2 on self object But I cannot do this class Test def test1 puts "I am in test1. A public method" self.test2 # Don't work test2 # works. (where is the object that I am calling this method on?) end private def test2 puts "I am in test2. A private Method" end end When test2 is public method I can

If I have a java class which is package-private (declared with "class", not "public class"), there is really no difference if the methods inside are declared public or protected or package-private, right? So which should I use, or when should I use which? I'm a bit confused. If I have a java class which is package-private (declared with "class", not "public class"), there is really no difference if the methods inside are declared public or protected or package-private, right? Well maybe not immediately. But if you then (or in the future) declare a 'protected' or 'public' class that inherits

In Java: public interface Foo { public static final int Bar = 0; } And in Scala, how can I create a trait Foo that has Bar , and I can access it as: Foo.Bar ? You can create a companion object (to make it the equivalent of static) and define the variable there using the final val keywords (to make it the equivalent of a final constant): trait Foo { } object Foo { final val Bar = 0 } Lots more on this here 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8867316/scala-trait-is-there-an-equivalent-of-java-interface-public-static-field

I am new to Kotlin and I am confused between open and public keywords. Could anyone please tell me the difference between those keywords? The open keyword means “open for extension“: The open annotation on a class is the opposite of Java's final : it allows others to inherit from this class. By default , all classes in Kotlin are final , which corresponds to Effective Java, Item 17: Design and document for inheritance or else prohibit it . You also need to be explicit about methods you want to make overridable, also marked with open : open class Base { open fun v() {} fun nv() {} } The public

I "learned" C++ at school, but there are several things I don't know, like where or what a compiler can optimize, seems I already know that inline and const can boost a little... If performance is an important thing (gaming programming for example), does putting class attributes not public ( private or protected ) allow the compiler to make more optimized code ? Because all my previous teacher were saying was it's more "secure" or "prevent not wanted or authorized class access/behavior", but in the end, I'm wonder if putting attributes not public can limit the scope and thus fasten things. I