private

问题 I know this question might have been asked before but I wanted to take my approach at it and get an opinion or possibly a better way to do it. I have three files a.h a.c and main.c Prototypes of functions regarding the struct will be in a.h while implementation will be in a.c and called from main.c the structure will be simple it can just look like this struct ctx{ int x; }; I want a.c to be able to manipulate the contents of the struct but prevent main from having any idea of what's inside.

问题 This question has already been asked here -- more than twice, actually --, but I myself haven't been able to derive a solution to my problem from the posts. What I have is a library, with, among others, a class named A in it. From class A I need to access an std::map<> , but it is private. Also, and based on the possibilities I found in the post I mentioned, class A has no templated function. I'm actually able to recompile the library, so that I could simply change the visibility. However ,

问题 Are private members inherited when inheriting the class in c#? I have read some topic related to this, somebody telling that private members are inherited but cannot access the private members, somebody telling that it is not inherited when inheriting the class. Please explain the concept. if it is inheriting can any body give an explanation? thanks 回答1: If I understand your question correctly then you're not concerned about the accessibility you are only concerned about private members are

问题 private Methods : I know how to: Run a private void method without parameters Run a private void method with any numbers and Type of parameters Run a private return method without parameters and with any kind of return-Type Run a private return method with any number and Type of parameters and with any kind of return-Type private Fields : I know how to: Set any Type of private field Set any Type of private static field Set any Type of private final field Set any Type of private static final

问题 I am trying on a project to use private values in my internal functions. In past I used only public ones, but I noticed that obfuscation is working much better when using as much as possible private parameters. My question is regarding Parent/Child classes. In my main class I define all the parameters as following : public class MyFatherClass { private long id = -1; public long ID { get { return this.id; } set { this.id = value; } } ... } So in all internal functions I access to my private

问题 "Support for private methods in interfaces was briefly in consideration for inclusion in Java SE 8 as part of the effort to add support for Lambda Expressions, but was withdrawn to enable better focus on higher priority tasks for Java SE 8. It is now proposed that support for private interface methods be undertaken thereby enabling non abstract methods of an interface to share code between them." So says the specification for http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/213 and says in bug report https:/

问题 I need to use some subset of class properties names as values in a map to use inside of the class. In following example I've replaced map by array. The problem is that if property is marked private it's not listed in keyof list. How can I specify type of keys if I need to include private names? var keys: Array<keyof A> = ["x", "y"]; // Error class A { private x = 7; public y = 8; private keys: Array<keyof A> = ["x", "y"]; // Error } There is the same error both for variable outside of the

问题 I've been playing around and searching a bit, but I can't figure this out. I have a pseudo private function within a JavaScript object that needs to get called via eval (because the name of the function is built dynamically). However, the function is hidden from the global scope by a closure and I cannot figure out how to reference it using eval(). Ex: var myObject = function(){ var privateFunctionNeedsToBeCalled = function() { alert('gets here'); }; return { publicFunction: function

问题 Let's say that we use the @Autowired annotation over various fields in a class, and that we didn't write setters or constructors that can also set the fields. Question - what should the access modifier be, private or package-private (i.e. none) ? For example: public class MyClass { @Autowired private MyService myService; } vs public class MyClass { @Autowired MyService myService; } In the first case ( private fields) Spring uses reflection to wire up the field, even if it doesn't have a

问题 is it possible to create an android application that is meant only for internal use? Basically a private application not meant to be installed by non-approved phones? If so what is the basic process of deployment? How do you get the app on the employees phone's? thanks! 回答1: The easiest way is to email it to them. Any email with an .apk attachment will get an "Install" button that you can tap to install the app. Installing from non-market sources needs to be enabled -- which is a bit of a