merge-conflict-resolution

问题 Can I tell Git to re-use the conflict resolution from an existing merge commit? I had rerere disabled at the time of commit. The new merge commit contains a few additional commits on the "ours" side of the merge (but they should not introduce new conflicts as they modified a different set of files). For instance, take the following DAG: m [master] Add new stuff * | o [old-master] Merge branch A (conflicts) |/a [branch A] n * * * */ * Now, what I want to do is to bring commits m and m^ into

问题 Can I tell Git to re-use the conflict resolution from an existing merge commit? I had rerere disabled at the time of commit. The new merge commit contains a few additional commits on the "ours" side of the merge (but they should not introduce new conflicts as they modified a different set of files). For instance, take the following DAG: m [master] Add new stuff * | o [old-master] Merge branch A (conflicts) |/a [branch A] n * * * */ * Now, what I want to do is to bring commits m and m^ into

问题 I have checked out gh-pages branch. I try git merge master and I receive the following "error: The following untracked working tree files would be overwritten by merge: ... Please move or remove them before you can merge." That's exactly what I want to do. I want the files on the master branch to override the versions of those same files on the gh-pages branch. I have read up a little on versions of the git rm... command and also tried git stash and git reset head . I still get the same error

问题 We recently switched from SVN to GIT, and I'm having some trouble converting our previous workflow. Mostly everything works, but today I got a weird cherry-pick conflict. I'm able to resolve the conflict, but I would like to know where this came from, because to my understanding there shouldn't be a conflict in this situation. Setup In our repository we have a master branch on which we develop. Four times a year we release a new version. We branch of of master into Release-x and this gets

问题 When there's a merge conflict in Git, junk like the following is inserted into the conflicting files. Three questions: How do you read these annotations? What are some strategies to use when fixing these merge conflicts? Is there a GUI tool for Mac that knows how to read these files and display the two versions side-by-side to make it easier to fix the problem? Note: In case it's relevant, I am using GitHub's Mac GUI client. 回答1: Everything between <<<<<< and ====== comes from the HEAD

问题 I'm trying to merge a git branch (test-development) back into master. There are lots of merge conflicts but I want as many as possible to be resolved via --theirs. Is there a way to tell git to merge with --theirs in bulk? 回答1: This will do it if you're mid-merge: git merge test-development # Automatic merge failed, a bunch of conflicts! git checkout --theirs ./path git add ./path git commit 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22544305/git-merge-accept-theirs-for-multiple-conflicts

问题 I'm using git to track changes to my LaTeX documents. I tend to keep feedback from co-authors in a separate branch and merge it in later. So far things seem to magically merge properly, but I would like to know when exactly a merge conflict occurs, so that I can obtain some real trust in the merging process (I would not like text to come out funky of course). There are a number of questions on StackOverflow that seem to ask the same thing, but none of the answers get very specific. For

问题 I'm using git to track changes to my LaTeX documents. I tend to keep feedback from co-authors in a separate branch and merge it in later. So far things seem to magically merge properly, but I would like to know when exactly a merge conflict occurs, so that I can obtain some real trust in the merging process (I would not like text to come out funky of course). There are a number of questions on StackOverflow that seem to ask the same thing, but none of the answers get very specific. For

问题 Our teem recently faced with merge that removes one leaf of merge and we "lost" changes (as if you perform hg merge --tool internal:local ). This happen because we don't experienced with hg merge command. hg diff shown only one difference, but not other. BASE --- HEAD1 --- MERGE \---- HEAD2 --/ Suppose in HEAD1 I merge HEAD2 but has not yet commit changes. HEAD2 diff against MERGE I see by hg diff . It is -r BASE:HEAD2 patch. How can I see diff between current local merge state with HEAD1 as

问题 I have forked a repository, but I'd like to keep it in sync with the upstream repository often. I have swapped some modules with my own implementation, so that means that every time I want to sync with the upstream repository, I keep getting the same merge conflicts over and over again. My question is: Is there a way to tell Git to use my own implementation for these case, rather than marking it as merge conflict? Is there something that I can automatize here, so I don't run into the same