merge-conflict-resolution

How to use XCode's mergetool to resolve conflicts?

丶灬走出姿态 提交于 2019-12-22 11:26:54
问题 I'm in the middle of a rebase and I need to fix some merge conflicts. When I open the file in XCode, I see the source control conflict markers (<<<<<<<, etc) in the file. How can I use XCode's mergetool to resolve these conflicts in a graphical fashion? I'm looking for this screen: 回答1: Pulling the answer from here # Tell system when Xcode utilities live: sudo xcode-select -switch /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer # Set "opendiff" as the default mergetool globally: git config -

If I Resolve a Conflict Does it Change Git Blame?

本小妞迷上赌 提交于 2019-12-22 06:58:18
问题 I'm trying to figure out whether a merge conflict was responsible for a bug, but I'm having difficulty because I'm not clear on how conflict resolution affects git blame . Let's say I have a file in master: a(); b(); c(); I modify it in master: a(); d(); c(); but so does a co-worker, and they modify it differently, in a separate branch which they then merge in to master: a(); e(); c(); Can resolving that conflict affect the blame? In other words, if my co-worker resolves the conflict by going

If I Resolve a Conflict Does it Change Git Blame?

社会主义新天地 提交于 2019-12-22 06:58:04
问题 I'm trying to figure out whether a merge conflict was responsible for a bug, but I'm having difficulty because I'm not clear on how conflict resolution affects git blame . Let's say I have a file in master: a(); b(); c(); I modify it in master: a(); d(); c(); but so does a co-worker, and they modify it differently, in a separate branch which they then merge in to master: a(); e(); c(); Can resolving that conflict affect the blame? In other words, if my co-worker resolves the conflict by going

Split a file with conflict markers

倖福魔咒の 提交于 2019-12-22 05:23:07
问题 I am looking for a tool that will split a file that has conflict markers into the two separate files. Is there anything out there that does this already? 回答1: xxdiff can do that: xxdiff --unmerge myfile.txt it also works if the conflict markers result from a 3-way diff xxdiff --unmerge3 myfile.txt 回答2: The tool I work for (ECMerge) does that, primarily with the target of helping you to merge them visually of course. You could as well save the left/right/ancestor files with the built-in

Git stash pop with binary - merge conflict

帅比萌擦擦* 提交于 2019-12-22 04:56:08
问题 I'm trying to do a "git stash pop" with a binary file. It results in a merge conflict. I just want to pull what's in the stash off and overwrite what's in the working directory. What is the easiest way to do that? 回答1: To restore all files to their stashed version: $ git checkout stash -- . 来源: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29979038/git-stash-pop-with-binary-merge-conflict

eGit Merge Resolution - Use Your Copy

二次信任 提交于 2019-12-22 03:40:45
问题 I still new to eGit. I'm trying to figure out how on earth to get eGit to resolve a merge conflict using my copy, no change. I'm referring to the notes on the eGit Wiki: http://wiki.eclipse.org/EGit/User_Guide#Possible_merge_results However, when I add my copy to resolve the conflict, eGit still leaves the diff marks in the file "<<<<<<< HEAD", "=======", ">>>>>>>". The doc says to add after using Merge-Tool: edit the working tree version until you are happy with it Team > Add the merged

Viewing changes to deleted files in git

我与影子孤独终老i 提交于 2019-12-21 17:01:52
问题 Let's say that when I branch off from master, there's a file colors.txt on the master branch of my repo with these contents: red green blue yellow I then branch off into my-branch , in which I make the following changes: Delete colors.txt Add red.txt with these contents: red Add green.txt with these contents: green Add blue.txt with these contents: blue Add yellow.txt with these contents: yellow Now, there have been some changes on master that I need, so I want to merge. However, someone has

git merge squash - conflict resolution when all I want is the changes from the branch I squashed from

邮差的信 提交于 2019-12-20 03:37:08
问题 I have github branch which I push to github when the master branch reaches some acceptable state (have done this once). To this end I did : MrD@MRSD /c/Dropbox/eclipse_workspaces/android/AndroidMonitoring (master) $ git checkout github Switched to branch 'github' MrD@MRSD /c/Dropbox/eclipse_workspaces/android/AndroidMonitoring (github) $ git merge --squash master Auto-merging src/gr/uoa/di/monitoring/android/services/Monitor.java CONFLICT (add/add): Merge conflict in src/gr/uoa/di/monitoring

Automatically resolve primary key merge conflict

↘锁芯ラ 提交于 2019-12-20 02:52:45
问题 could you please suggest me the way I could automatically resolve primary key conflicts during a merge between Publisher and Subscriber. It seems Sql Server doesn't do it out of the box :(. Conflict viewer shows me next message: A row insert at '_publisher_server_' could not be propagated to '_subscriber_server_'. This failure can be caused by a constraint violation. Violation of PRIMARY KEY constraint 'PK_ PartPlan _FD9D7F927172C0B5'. Cannot insert duplicate key in object '_table_name_'.

How to interactively (visually) resolve conflicts in SourceTree / git

≡放荡痞女 提交于 2019-12-18 09:59:06
问题 I'm using (Windows) SourceTree for my git project. I can do it in either command prompt or Linux terminal. But, I'm wondering whether there is a nice way to interactively and visually resolve conflicts. For example, if pull detects conflicts, popping up a GUI-based conflict tool (e.g., P4Merge). Is it possible? I am always doing manual conflict resolving, which is just painful. This is, for example, a git pull message, from SourceTree. git -c diff.mnemonicprefix=false -c core.quotepath=false