merge-conflict-resolution

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25887799/using-source-tree-rebase-with-conflict-rebase-doesnt-work-after-conflict-reso

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25887799/using-source-tree-rebase-with-conflict-rebase-doesnt-work-after-conflict-reso

问题 So I am new to using vimdiff, however I feel like there is some error. Whenever I try to choose the changes from the remote repository with the command: :diffg RE I get the error: E93: More than one match for RE Not sure where this is coming from or how to solve it. I was pretty surprised that stack overflow doesn't seem to have this problem posted anywhere. Thanks in advance to anyone who can help :) 回答1: There's probably one of the file paths that match the string "RE". Try :diffget REMOTE

问题 I'm trying to merge a big topic branch into the master, but I want a separate commit that shows how the conflict resolution happened. The goal is to have one commit that shows "these files conflicted and how they conflicted" and the next commit would show "this is how the conflicts were resolved". I.e. the first commit would contain the conflict markers . The reason for this is that the big topic branch has been reviewed and tested, as has the master branch. Of the merge, we want to review

问题 I'm trying to merge a big topic branch into the master, but I want a separate commit that shows how the conflict resolution happened. The goal is to have one commit that shows "these files conflicted and how they conflicted" and the next commit would show "this is how the conflicts were resolved". I.e. the first commit would contain the conflict markers . The reason for this is that the big topic branch has been reviewed and tested, as has the master branch. Of the merge, we want to review

问题 Is there any way of preventing files with merge conflict from getting committed in git? No one is going to commit files with conflict intentionally. But is there a way to prevent files from getting committed in git? Does git have any settings or configurable values anywhere, where it can prevent files by looking for <<<<<<< , ======= or >>>>>>> symbols? 回答1: VonC's answer already explains the different kinds of hooks where you might want to check for merge commits. If you just want a simple

问题 Using CI/CD approach, one of the principle mentioned, here: Automate wherever possible Merging can be done two ways, based on the scenario: 1) Fast-forward merge 2) 3-way merge Does it make sense to think about automating merge conflicts? 回答1: No. A merge conflict is literally the end result of a failure to automate. Remember: Git is doing its best to ensure that it doesn't lose any data, and a merge conflict is Git telling you in its standard, paranoid fashion that it could lose data and it

问题 Here's a rather advanced question for true ClearCase experts: I frequently perform a rebase on a ClearCase snapshot view that has just a very limited number of small changes in few files (e.g. file1.c, file2.c, file3.c). I do it with the following on the UNIX command line: cleartool rebase -recommended -complete Sometimes, while this command runs, out of the blue, and for no exlained reasons (yet), I get prompted for manual input to solve some "merge" conflicts. But they make no sense to me,

问题 Note: The underlying situation of this question is also part of a slightly different question here. Situation I have a trunk, where earlier, a branch has been made from. Then, in the trunk some file renamings have been made. These renamings were accidentially made by "copy/delete", not with the proper svn rename process as they should have. This is described in the TSVN docs, and in my case the "Repair move" was omitted. Now I have tree conflicts, when merging the branch back to the trunk:

问题 I have rep1 repository with two commits on master branch. These commits have file.txt with the following content: line1 line2 I clone rep1 into rep2 and checkout remote branch as tracking: git checkout --track rep1/master Then in this repository I modify first line of file.txt to be: line1-modified-rep2 line2 Make commit. Then modify its second line to be line1-modified-rep2 line2-modified-rep2 Make commit. So, here in the rep2 I have added two commits to master branch that tracks remote rep1